https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/01/andhra-pradesh-high-court-holds-that-pendency-of-execution-petition-against-principal-borrower-does-not-bar-separate-execution-against-guarantor-or-other-judgment-debtors-under-section-145-cpc/Lawcutoren2026-05-01T04:12:57+00:00Andhra Pradesh High Court Holds That Pendency of Execution Petition Against Principal Borrower Does Not Bar Separate Execution Against Guarantor or Other Judgment Debtors Under Section 145 CPCArticle 227 CPC execution petition challenge dismissed, execution petition maintainability against guarantor India, civil revision petition execution objection guarantor India, arbitral award execution against surety CPC law, Potturi Venkata Rama Vanaja v Sundaram Finance case summary, arbitration award enforcement multiple respondents execution, decree holder rights against multiple judgment debtors India, guarantor and principal borrower joint liability execution law India, parallel execution petitions against guarantor and borrower, execution proceedings guarantor liability without exhausting borrower remedy, surety enforcement decree CPC latest judgment, guarantor liability execution petition India, Andhra Pradesh High Court Section 145 CPC judgment 2026, Section 145 CPC interpretation High Court ruling, Sundaram Finance execution case Andhra Pradesh High Courthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/30/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-removal-of-cwc-officer-holds-unexplained-money-transfer-alone-insufficient-for-bribery-finding-without-evidentiary-link-to-official-favour/Lawcutoren2026-04-30T05:58:29+00:00Delhi High Court Sets Aside Removal of CWC Officer; Holds Unexplained Money Transfer Alone Insufficient for Bribery Finding Without Evidentiary Link to Official Favourdisciplinary proceedings illegal gratification charge failure, reinstatement with continuity of service Delhi High Court, unexplained money transfer not proof of bribery India, penalty disproportionate minor misconduct India, departmental inquiry evidentiary standard preponderance probabilities, service law proportionality of punishment India, Rajesh Choudhary v Union of India judgment summary, inquiry report inconsistency disciplinary case law, bribery charge without quid pro quo not sustainable, judicial review disciplinary authority findings India, public servant corruption charge evidentiary requirement India, Delhi High Court CWC officer reinstatement case 2026, Sanjeev Narula judgment service jurisprudence, unexplained bank credits suspicion vs proof briberyhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-83.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/30/patna-high-court-upholds-disqualification-of-mukhiya-elected-from-ebc-reserved-seat-rules-inconsistent-caste-claims-impermissible-for-electoral-benefits/Lawcutoren2026-04-30T02:21:05+00:00Patna High Court Upholds Disqualification of Mukhiya Elected from EBC Reserved Seat; Rules Inconsistent Caste Claims Impermissible for Electoral BenefitsKoeri vs Dangi caste dispute Bihar Panchayat election, election from reserved seat invalid caste claim judgment, Manoj Prasad v State Election Commission judgment 2026, false caste certificate election disqualification India, inconsistent caste claims election law India, R Vishwanatha Pillai case caste certificate fraud, Patna High Court caste disqualification Mukhiya EBC case, Bihar Panchayat Raj Act Section 136(2) caste dispute, EBC reservation misuse case India, Union of India v N Murugesan principle caste claims, doctrine of approbate and reprobate election cases, CID enquiry caste verification Bihar case, caste verification revenue records evidentiary value India, caste scrutiny committee findings upheld High Court, caste identity fraud public office disqualification Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-11.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/30/supreme-court-holds-that-admission-of-claim-by-resolution-professional-does-not-constitute-acknowledgment-of-debt-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-quashes-cirp-admission-as-time-barred/Lawcutoren2026-04-30T02:14:32+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Does Not Constitute Acknowledgment of Debt Under Section 18 of Limitation Act; Quashes CIRP Admission as Time-BarredCIRP admission time barred Supreme Court ruling, insolvency application dismissed as time barred India 2026, IBC Section 60(6) limitation exclusion explained, Supreme Court limitation IBC Section 7 judgment 2026, NCLT NCLAT orders set aside limitation grounds, insolvency law India limitation computation Supreme Court, COVID limitation extension Supreme Court impact insolvency cases, NPA date starting limitation IBC Supreme Court ruling, acknowledgment of debt requirements Section 18 Limitation Act India, Article 137 limitation IBC default date NPA principle, IRP admission not acknowledgment Section 18 Limitation Act, assignment of debt ARC limitation issues India, latest Supreme Court insolvency judgments India IBC limitationhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-82.png?w=150