https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/12/assistant-legal-counsel-at-yes-bank-mumbai/Lawcutoren2026-05-12T15:05:20+00:00Assistant Legal Counsel at YES Bank, Mumbaiin-house counsel jobs India, legal officer jobs bank, risk mitigation legal jobs, legal advisor bank jobs, legal associate banking sector, RBI compliance jobs, banking contracts and documentation, banking legal jobs India, arbitration and litigation banking, banking legal advisory role, LLB jobs India, LLM jobs banking sector, banking law careers, YES BANK careers, corporate legal jobs India, legal drafting jobs India, banking and finance lawyer jobs, banking litigation jobs, private bank legal jobs, YES BANK recruitment 2026, financial services legal jobs, legal vacancies YES BANK, NBFC legal jobs, banking operations legal support, legal jobs for advocates, contract management legal jobs, bank legal department jobs, jobs for law graduates India, commercial contracts lawyer, banking regulation act jobs, YES BANK legal jobs, financial law careers India, legal compliance banking sector, regulatory compliance lawyer, corporate counsel banking, legal support banking business, legal analyst banking, legal openings in private banks, banking corporate legal team, corporate law banking jobs, legal careers financial institutions, legal risk management banking, YES BANK legal departmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/13606436_10153555298537610_3762280275164299121_n.webp?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/12/18369/Lawcutoren2026-05-12T13:55:06+00:00Supreme Court Directs Rajasthan to Grant Rajasthani Language Official Educational StatusArticle 19(1)(a) language rights, Rajasthani language recognition, Rajasthan education policy Rajasthani, Justice Sandeep Mehta judgment, Supreme Court constitutional language rights, mother tongue instruction Supreme Court, Supreme Court Rajasthani language judgment, Padam Mehta vs State of Rajasthan, REET 2021 Rajasthani language case, education in mother tongue judgment, Rajasthan schools Rajasthani language, Rajasthani as medium of instruction, 2026 INSC 476, Supreme Court mother tongue education ruling, RTE Act mother tongue provision, Rajasthan government language policy, regional languages in education system, language rights jurisprudence India, NEP 2020 regional language education, Rajasthani language constitutional status, regional language education India, pedagogical importance of mother tongue, Rajasthani universities recognition, Supreme Court on educational rights, local language medium of instruction, Eighth Schedule and education rights, Rajasthan High Court PIL language case, constitutional governance and language rights, University of Rajasthan Rajasthani language, Indian constitutional law language policy, Jai Narain Vyas University Rajasthani, linguistic rights in India, Rajasthani subject in schoolshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-12t193621.161.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/11/diac-is-hiring-deputy-counsels-9-positions-open-for-2026/Lawcutoren2026-05-11T13:14:56+00:00DIAC Is Hiring Deputy Counsels — 9 Positions Open for 2026legal career opportunities, legal recruitment India, DIAC Deputy Counsel, legal jobs india, arbitration law jobs, DIAC recruitment 2026, advocate recruitment 2026, Delhi High Court jobs, advocate jobs Delhi, Westlaw legal recruitment, Deputy Counsel vacancy 2026, arbitration practitioner jobs, legal writing jobs, litigation and arbitration jobs, legal research jobs, Delhi International Arbitration Centre, law firm alternative careers, legal employment news, Indian arbitration sector, high paying legal jobs, Indian legal jobs, law jobs for advocates, commercial law jobs India, advocate vacancy notification, law graduates jobs India, DIAC official notification, contract legal jobs Delhi, SCC Online skills, contractual legal jobs, Delhi arbitration centre jobs, Delhi legal openings, legal analyst jobs India, Delhi court recruitment, legal professionals recruitmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/banner_7.jpg?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/11/madras-high-court-quashes-pocso-proceedings-against-school-teacher-holds-classroom-discipline-cannot-be-criminalised-under-child-protection-law/Lawcutoren2026-05-11T04:30:01+00:00Madras High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against School Teacher, Holds Classroom Discipline Cannot Be Criminalised Under Child Protection Lawconstitutional courts duty to prevent misuse of penal statutes, victim disowns allegations in camera before High Court, false or exaggerated POCSO allegations against teacher, prosecution manifestly attended with mala fide, continuation of prosecution would amount to injustice, disciplinary warning not equal to criminal intimidation, Section 7 and 8 POCSO Act ingredients not made out, educational institutions and misuse of POCSO provisions, classroom discipline cannot be criminalised under POCSO Act, quashing of criminal proceedings under inherent powers, Justice L Victoria Gowri POCSO judgment, Madras High Court quashes POCSO case against school teacher, criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC not established, trivial classroom episode exaggerated into criminal case, absence of sexual intent under POCSO Act, High Court protects teacher from misuse of criminal law, Section 95 IPC trivial acts principle applied, Special Court for POCSO Act Cases Tirunelveli, Section 528 BNSS quashing criminal proceedings 2026, false POCSO cases undermine sanctity of child protection law, in camera interaction with child victim by court, abuse of process of law under BNSS Section 528, inconsistency in Section 161 and 164 statements, teacher acquitted from bad touch allegations, POCSO Act misuse jurisprudence India, S Rajadurai Lingam v State of Tamil Nadu and Another, pedagogic correction versus sexual offence allegationshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-11t095847.735.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/11/madhya-pradesh-high-court-sets-aside-organised-crime-charge-under-section-1114-bns-against-accused-in-cyber-fraud-case-holds-that-mere-multiple-firs-or-complaints-under-investigation-do-not-satisfy/Lawcutoren2026-05-11T04:25:11+00:00Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside Organised Crime Charge Under Section 111(4) BNS Against Accused in Cyber Fraud Case, Holds That Mere Multiple FIRs or Complaints Under Investigation Do Not Satisfy Statutory Parameters for Invoking Organised Crime ProvisionsMadhya Pradesh High Court refund of excess stamp duty judgment, Section 45(2) Indian Stamp Act limitation condonation, Justice Deepak Khot stamp duty refund ruling 2026, Section 5 Limitation Act applicable to Stamp Act proceedings, Gram Panchayat versus Municipal Corporation stamp duty rates dispute, quasi judicial authority under Indian Stamp Act, excess stamp duty paid due to wrong classification of land, High Court quashes rejection of refund application on technical grounds, Section 29(2) Limitation Act and special statutes interplay, State cannot retain unlawfully collected stamp duty, no express bar under Stamp Act for Limitation Act application, MP High Court Jabalpur stamp duty case 2026, Bano Saiyed Parwad vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority cited, procedural technicalities should not defeat substantive justice, Nanji Dana Patel vs State of Maharashtra relied upon, refund of excess stamp duty beyond limitation period, delay condonation in excess stamp duty refund cases, Article 226 relief in stamp duty refund matters, fiscal litigation and unjust enrichment principles, M/s Betul Town v State of Madhya Pradesh, condonation of delay in revenue matters, refund of government dues with interest, limitation bars remedy not substantive right principle, beneficial interpretation in fiscal statutes, Lawcutor legal update on stamp duty refund and limitation lawhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-11t095409.772.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/11/madhya-pradesh-high-court-holds-that-delay-in-filing-refund-application-under-section-452-of-indian-stamp-act-can-be-condoned-under-section-5-of-limitation-act-where-statute-does-not-expressly-bar-i/Lawcutoren2026-05-11T04:18:05+00:00Madhya Pradesh High Court Holds That Delay in Filing Refund Application Under Section 45(2) of Indian Stamp Act Can Be Condoned Under Section 5 of Limitation Act Where Statute Does Not Expressly Bar It, Sets Aside Rejection Order and Remands Matter for Decision on MeritsMadhya Pradesh High Court refund of excess stamp duty judgment, Section 45(2) Indian Stamp Act limitation condonation, Justice Deepak Khot stamp duty refund ruling 2026, Section 5 Limitation Act applicable to Stamp Act proceedings, Gram Panchayat versus Municipal Corporation stamp duty rates dispute, quasi judicial authority under Indian Stamp Act, excess stamp duty paid due to wrong classification of land, High Court quashes rejection of refund application on technical grounds, Section 29(2) Limitation Act and special statutes interplay, State cannot retain unlawfully collected stamp duty, no express bar under Stamp Act for Limitation Act application, MP High Court Jabalpur stamp duty case 2026, Bano Saiyed Parwad vs Chief Controlling Revenue Authority cited, procedural technicalities should not defeat substantive justice, Nanji Dana Patel vs State of Maharashtra relied upon, refund of excess stamp duty beyond limitation period, delay condonation in excess stamp duty refund cases, Article 226 relief in stamp duty refund matters, fiscal litigation and unjust enrichment principles, M/s Betul Town v State of Madhya Pradesh, condonation of delay in revenue matters, refund of government dues with interest, limitation bars remedy not substantive right principle, beneficial interpretation in fiscal statutes, Lawcutor legal update on stamp duty refund and limitation lawhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-11t094643.443.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/11/rajasthan-high-court-rash-and-negligent-driving-of-car-driver-held-as-primary-cause-of-accident-income-tax-returns-to-prevail-over-notional-income-for-compensation-assessment/Lawcutoren2026-05-11T04:13:24+00:00Rajasthan High Court- Rash and Negligent Driving of Car Driver Held as Primary Cause of Accident; Income Tax Returns to Prevail Over Notional Income for Compensation AssessmentPranay Sethi and Magma General Insurance principles applied, Rajasthan High Court motor accident compensation judgment, claimants can recover full compensation from either insurer, T.O. Anthony v Karvarnan relied upon, future prospects added in compensation calculation, post mortem report not reliable for age determination, parked truck without warning signals contributory negligence, Nidhi Bhargava and S Vishnu Ganga Supreme Court rulings followed, Malarvizhi v United India Insurance Company cited, admissibility of income tax returns in compensation cases, joint and several liability of insurers in composite negligence, highest ITR to be considered for compensation calculation, Sushma v Nitin Ganapati Rangole distinguished by Rajasthan High Court, roadside truck parking accident liability, multiplier method corrected based on actual age, Income Tax Returns preferred over notional income in motor accident claims, apportionment of negligence 75 percent car and 25 percent truck upheld, driving licence and PAN card accepted for age proof, Rajasthan High Court Jaipur Bench accident claim appeal, Lawcutor motor accident and insurance law updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-11t094111.834.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/11/rajasthan-high-court-construction-on-gair-mumkin-nala-land-impermissible-even-for-public-purpose-doctrine-of-public-trust-mandates-preservation-of-natural-water-channels/Lawcutoren2026-05-11T03:51:49+00:00Rajasthan High Court: Construction on Gair Mumkin Nala Land Impermissible Even for Public Purpose; Doctrine of Public Trust Mandates Preservation of Natural Water Channelsnatural resources cannot be diverted for administrative convenience, public trust doctrine and ecological framework, natural drainage channel cannot be used for construction, public utility cannot justify destruction of natural water channels, restoration of natural water channel ordered, ecological protection under Article 21 Constitution, groundwater recharge and drainage pattern protection, Gulab Kothari v State of Rajasthan referred, Rajasthan High Court Gair Mumkin Nala judgment, restoration of original recorded nature ordered within three months, environmental governance and sustainable development, Dausa Village Khatwa nala land dispute, preservation of natural drains and catchment areas, revenue records determine ecological character of land, State directed to remove encroachments from nala land, no non conforming use of land recorded as Gair Mumkin Nala, Lawcutor environmental and constitutional law updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-11t092031.813.png?w=150