https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/16/himachal-pradesh-high-court-holds-that-mere-sale-of-matrimonial-house-by-husband-and-in-laws-cannot-be-construed-as-an-act-of-demanding-dowry-or-cruelty-under-section-498-a-ipc-quashes-fir-after-mutu/Lawcutoren2026-05-16T08:27:44+00:00Himachal Pradesh High Court Holds that Mere Sale of Matrimonial House by Husband and In-laws Cannot be Construed as an Act of Demanding Dowry or Cruelty under Section 498-A IPC; Quashes FIR after Mutual Consent DivorceLawcutor matrimonial law update, criminal proceedings abuse of process, no specific dowry demand allegations, cruelty allegations under Section 498A IPC, Section 528 BNSS quashing petition, FIR under Sections 498A 406 34 IPC quashed, Family Court mutual consent decree relevance, matrimonial dispute criminal case quashed, Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 498A quashing, continuation of proceedings abuse of law, sale of house cannot constitute dowry demand, sale of matrimonial house not dowry demand, Rahul Dadhwal v State of Himachal Pradesh, ingredients of Section 498A IPC not made out, Himachal Pradesh HC latest matrimonial judgment, no coercion for valuable security alleged, cruelty definition under Section 498A explained, High Court inherent powers criminal proceedings, mutual consent divorce and quashing of FIR, Justice Sandeep Sharma judgment, FIR quashed after mutual divorce settlement, amicable settlement matrimonial dispute, Baijnath Police Station FIR quashed, allegations taken at face value no offence made out, criminal case after divorce settlement, criminal law and matrimonial disputes India, quashing of criminal proceedings after compromise, powers of High Court to quash FIR, Section 498A misuse jurisprudencehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-16t134249.320.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/16/calcutta-high-court-holds-high-court-can-invoke-section-482-crpc-to-permit-compounding-even-after-final-disposal-of-criminal-revision-when-right-to-compound-arises-due-to-change-in-circumstances/Lawcutoren2026-05-16T08:07:27+00:00Calcutta High Court Holds High Court Can Invoke Section 482 CrPC to Permit Compounding Even After Final Disposal of Criminal Revision When Right to Compound Arises Due to Change in CircumstancesCriminal Procedure, Lawcutor criminal procedure update, High Court permits composition after final judgment, Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee judgment, criminal revision disposed but compromise allowed, compromise after conviction criminal case, functus officio and inherent powers, Calcutta High Court Section 482 CrPC judgment, lawful settlement between parties criminal case, compounding of offence after revision disposed, inherent powers to secure ends of justice, criminal law on functus officio doctrine, Goutam Saha v State of West Bengal, Section 362 CrPC limitation explained, Section 326 IPC converted to Section 325 IPC, compounding of compoundable offence after conviction, change in circumstances Section 482 CrPC, Section 482 CrPC sui generis powers, execution of sentence stayed on settlement, criminal justice and amicable settlement, High Court inherent jurisdiction after final order, criminal revision and compromise jurisprudence, Mostt Simrikhia v Dolley Mukherjee relied upon, inherent powers of High Court under CrPC, compromise in hurt case IPC 325, finality of judgments versus complete justice, power to prevent abuse of process, Section 325 IPC compoundable offencehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-16t133541.907.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/15/bombay-high-court-invites-applications-for-judicial-research-assistant-2026/Lawcutoren2026-05-15T04:51:57+00:00Bombay High Court Invites Applications for Judicial Research Assistant – 2026Advocate Jobs High Court, Bombay HC Recruitment Notification, Court Jobs for Advocates, Legal Career Opportunities India, Bombay High Court Recruitment 2026, LLM Jobs in High Court, Bombay HC JRA Notification 2026, High Court Jobs for Law Graduates, Legal Jobs for Freshers, Bombay High Court Careers, High Court Legal Vacancy, Legal Employment India, Judicial Research Assistant Jobs India, Rs 80000 Law Job, Legal Research Assistant Vacancy, Bombay High Court Judicial Research Assistant Recruitment, Law Graduate Recruitment India, Bombay High Court Latest Vacancy, Judicial Research Assistant Vacancy 2026, Bombay High Court JRA Recruitment 2026, High Court Research Assistant Posts, Judicial Assistant Recruitment 2026, Law Internship High Court, Law Graduate Jobs 2026, Judicial Jobs Maharashtra, Court Research Assistant Jobs, Judicial Research Assistant Salary, Mumbai High Court Vacancy 2026, Judicial Clerkship India, LLM Recruitment 2026, Judicial Research Assistant Application Last Date, Judicial Jobs for Freshers, Legal Assistant Jobs India, High Paying Law Jobs India, Bombay High Court News, Bombay High Court Interview Process, Research Assistant to Judges, High Court Contract Jobs, Government Law Jobs India, Judiciary Recruitment 2026, Bombay High Court Official Notification, High Court Vacancy Mumbai, Bombay High Court Application Form, JRA Eligibility Criteria, Bombay HC Law Vacancy, High Court Research Jobs, Legal Research Jobs India, Judicial Research Assistant Selection Process, LLB Jobs 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/images-15.jpg?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/15/thrissur-consumer-commission-holds-ims-learning-resources-liable-for-deficiency-in-service-for-failure-to-issue-proper-receipt-for-full-fee-collected-from-student/Lawcutoren2026-05-15T04:19:47+00:00Thrissur Consumer Commission Holds IMS Learning Resources Liable for Deficiency in Service for Failure to Issue Proper Receipt for Full Fee Collected from Studentnon issuance of receipt deficiency in service, GRE coaching consumer complaint, IELTS fee receipt not issued, coaching institute transparency obligation, coaching institute litigation Kerala, coaching institute failed to issue receipt, receipt mandatory for consumer payments, compensation for mental agony consumer case, consumer complaint against IMS Learning, consumer forum coaching institute deficiency in service, consumer forum on coaching classes, Praneesh v IMS Learning Resources Pvt Ltd, failure to provide proper receipt legal consequences, deficiency in educational services, Lawcutor consumer law update, education services consumer protection, consumer rights against coaching institutes, District Consumer Commission Thrissur judgment, IELTS coaching fee receipt dispute, IMS Learning Resources case Thrissur, consumer protection act coaching institute, litigation costs awarded consumer complaint, National Commission precedent coaching institute cases, service provider duty to issue receipt, Thrissur consumer court order 2026, educational institute accountability, refund dispute coaching programme, consumer forum compensation with interest, maintainability of complaint against coaching institute, consumer dispute redressal commission Keralahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-15t094834.969.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/15/allahabad-high-court-sets-aside-trial-court-order-rejecting-accuseds-application-to-summon-defence-witnesses-under-section-233-crpc-in-murder-trial-emphasises-accuseds-right-to-fair/Lawcutoren2026-05-15T04:09:27+00:00Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Trial Court Order Rejecting Accused’s Application to Summon Defence Witnesses Under Section 233 CrPC in Murder Trial, Emphasises Accused’s Right to Fair Opportunity to Prove Alibialibi defence criminal trial, fair trial rights accused, trial court cannot arbitrarily reject defence witnesses, Justice Vivek Kumar Singh judgment, rejection of defence witness application set aside, Bangkok travel alibi case, Section 311 CrPC vs Section 233 CrPC distinction, Section 256 BNSS defence evidence, Section 233 CrPC mandatory provision, right to lead defence evidence, accused abroad at time of offence, court interference limited under Section 233 CrPC, criminal jurisprudence on alibi plea, Allahabad HC latest criminal law judgment, death penalty case procedural safeguards, immigration officer summoned as witness, trial court exceeded jurisdiction, High Court on summoning defence witnesses, denial of fair trial criminal proceedings, Section 528 BNSS application allowed, accused entitled to fair opportunity of defence, Arms Act and murder case defence rights, Lawcutor criminal procedure updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-15t093803.848.png?w=150