https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/rajasthan-high-court-directs-bank-of-baroda-to-de-freeze-petitioners-account-except-for-disputed-cyber-fraud-amount-of-rs-1364-32-holds-that-freezing-entire-account-merely-because-a-small-s/Lawcutoren2026-04-27T08:34:39+00:00Rajasthan High Court Directs Bank of Baroda to De-Freeze Petitioner’s Account Except for Disputed Cyber Fraud Amount of Rs.1,364.32; Holds That Freezing Entire Account Merely Because a Small Sum Was Credited Is Arbitrary and Prejudicialhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-80.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/rajasthan-high-court-directs-hdfc-bank-to-de-freeze-petitioners-firm-account-except-for-disputed-cyber-fraud-amount-of-rs-177758-39-holds-that-freezing-entire-account-merely-on-account-of/Lawcutoren2026-04-27T08:16:48+00:00Rajasthan High Court Directs HDFC Bank to De-Freeze Petitioner’s Firm Account Except for Disputed Cyber Fraud Amount of Rs.1,77,758.39; Holds That Freezing Entire Account Merely on Account of a Single Transaction Is Arbitrary and Prejudicial to Business Rightsbank lien vs account freeze legal difference India, Indian courts on arbitrary bank account freezing, cyber crime investigation and bank account operation rights, Rajasthan High Court bank account defreeze order 2026, bank cannot freeze entire account partial lien principle India, cyber fraud bank account freezing legal position India, proportionality in bank account freezing court ruling, writ petition against bank account freeze India legal update, business account freeze relief High Court Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-79.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/aam-aadmi-party-national-convenor-arvind-kejriwal-writes-to-delhi-high-court-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-declining-further-participation-in-cbi-liquor-policy-revision-petition-citing-grave-apprehens/Lawcutoren2026-04-27T08:03:28+00:00Aam Aadmi Party National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal Writes to Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma Declining Further Participation in CBI Liquor Policy Revision Petition, Citing Grave Apprehensions of Bias and Invoking Gandhian Principles of Satyagrahaconflict of interest judiciary children government panel advocates, Satyagraha principle judiciary protest India legal news, Delhi High Court recusal rejection 20 April 2026 analysis, judicial impartiality and public confidence India courts, Kejriwal vs CBI legal battle latest news, criminal revision petition 134 2026 Delhi HC update, high profile political case judiciary independence Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-78.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/delhi-high-court-holds-false-self-declaration-of-educational-qualification-in-nomination-affidavit-form-26-does-not-constitute-corrupt-practice-under-section-1234-of-rp-act-election-petition-challe/Lawcutoren2026-04-27T07:57:08+00:00Delhi High Court Holds False Self-Declaration of Educational Qualification in Nomination Affidavit/Form 26 Does Not Constitute Corrupt Practice Under Section 123(4) of RP Act; Election Petition Challenging 2020 Karol Bagh Polls Rendered Infructuous After 2025 ElectionsNand Ram Bagri v Jai Kishan distinction Delhi HC, Form 26 nomination affidavit legal effect India, Delhi High Court election petition 2026 judgment, candidate affidavit misrepresentation not corrupt practice, corrupt practice election law self declaration false statement, false affidavit educational qualification election law India, Vishesh Ravi election case Delhi HC ruling, publication requirement under section 123(4) RP Act, section 123(4) representation of people act interpretation, election petition infructuous term expired principle, non disclosure educational qualification election law India, Ajmera Shyam v Kova Laksmi Supreme Court election law, strict pleading requirement election petitions Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-77.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/26/uttarakhand-high-court-sets-aside-conviction-under-up-gangsters-act-holds-mere-inclusion-in-gang-chart-or-criminal-antecedents-insufficient-without-proof-of-organized-gang-and-continuing-unlawful-act/Lawcutoren2026-04-26T05:21:23+00:00Uttarakhand High Court Sets Aside Conviction Under UP Gangsters Act, Holds Mere Inclusion in Gang Chart or Criminal Antecedents Insufficient Without Proof of Organized Gang and Continuing Unlawful Activitypolice witnesses without corroboration insufficient evidence, uttarakhand high court gangsters act judgment 2026, benefit of doubt criminal law high court ruling, organized gang proof legal standard india, hemo pant vs state uttarakhand case summary, section 2 3 gangsters act interpretation india, continuing unlawful activity requirement gangsters act, mere gang chart not sufficient conviction law, criminal antecedents insufficient for conviction hc ruling, acquittal in gangster act case lack of proof, gang chart evidentiary value indian law, organized crime law india gangsters act essentials, special penal statutes strict proof requirement india, criminal appeal allowed uttarakhand hc 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-50.png?w=150