<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/10/supreme-court-dismisses-ews-certificate-appeals-in-up-health-workers-recruitment-strict-compliance-is-non-negotiable/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T14:13:26+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Dismisses EWS Certificate Appeals in UP Health Workers Recruitment: Strict Compliance is Non-Negotiable</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, Supreme Court, Health Worker Female recruitment 2021, Uttar Pradesh SSSSC recruitment, public employment law India, reservation eligibility criteria, defective EWS certificate rejection, EWS reservation India, cut off date eligibility, government job recruitment disputes, EWS certificate validity, EWS income and asset certificate rules, strict compliance recruitment rules, financial year requirement EWS, Allahabad High Court judgment upheld, Divya v Union of India case, UPSC v Gaurav Singh case, EWS certificate format Form I</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-54.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/10/supreme-court-holds-that-employee-abandoning-service-cannot-claim-pension-by-treating-it-as-voluntary-retirement/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T08:45:04+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Holds That Employee Abandoning Service Cannot Claim Pension by Treating It as Voluntary Retirement</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, Supreme Court, Industrial Disputes Act 1947, unauthorized absence employment law, disputed entitlement vs computation, SBI employee pension dispute, pension law India, voluntary abandonment of service, service law judgments India, Madras High Court service law, labour court jurisdiction Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act, voluntary retirement vs abandonment, probation period and pension, K G Seshadri case, Rule 22 SBI Pension Rules, pensionable service calculation, State Bank of India Employees Pension Fund Rules 1955, pension eligibility conditions, qualifying service for pension, denial of pension benefits</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-53.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/10/supreme-court-holds-that-a-person-directly-affected-by-interim-order-in-writ-petition-cannot-be-denied-impleadment/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T04:17:21+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Holds That A Person Directly Affected By Interim Order In Writ Petition Cannot Be Denied Impleadment</news:title><news:keywords>punjab and haryana high court, natural justice principles, necessary party vs proper party, building law disputes, writ jurisdiction India, M/s Chopra Hotels Pvt Ltd case, judicial review of administrative action, right to be heard, status quo order, third party rights in litigation, Order 1 Rule 10 CPC principles, civil procedure law India</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-13.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/allahabad-high-court-upholds-fathers-custody-of-minor-daughter-in-emotional-battle-with-maternal-grandfather-grants-liberal-visitation-rights/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T17:11:31+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Allahabad High Court Upholds Father’s Custody of Minor Daughter in Emotional Battle with Maternal Grandfather; Grants Liberal Visitation Rights</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, allahabad high court, guardians and wards act 1890, sudesh garg vs kushagra garg, natural guardian father rights, welfare of child principle, custody disputes India, custody to father, Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act 1956, maternal grandfather visitation, visitation rights grandparents, child custody law India, remarriage and child custody, stepmother and custody dispute, Family Court Meerut, family law judgments, child welfare paramount consideration, visitation rights order, minor child custody, Supreme Court custody precedents</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-52.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/allahabad-high-court-stays-magistrates-order-directing-io-to-consider-accuseds-documentary-evidence-during-investigation/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T16:55:18+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Allahabad High Court Stays Magistrate’s Order Directing IO to Consider Accused’s Documentary Evidence During Investigation</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, allahabad high court, Magistrate Jurisdiction, BNS Offences, pre cognizance stage rights of accused, investigation stage law, Magistrate powers investigation, criminal procedure law, Vivek Kumar Singh, IO powers, case diary requirement, Sona Jain vs State of UP, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, stay of magistrate order, Section 528 BNSS, criminal investigation process</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-51.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/supreme-court-holds-gratuity-cannot-be-released-if-either-departmental-or-judicial-proceedings-remain-pending-against-retired-employee-under-rule-691c-of-ccs-pension-rules-1972/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T07:12:07+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Holds Gratuity Cannot Be Released if Either Departmental or Judicial Proceedings Remain Pending Against Retired Employee Under Rule 69(1)(c) of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, Supreme Court, service law, Public Employment, Disciplinary Proceedings, pending criminal proceedings, statutory interpretation, gratuity withholding, pension rules interpretation, judicial proceedings pending, gratuity embargo, departmental exoneration, departmental proceedings, criminal trial pendency, government servant retirement benefits, pension and gratuity law, CCS Pension Rules 1972, Rule 69(1)(c), Himachal Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, retirement dues, service jurisprudence</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-49.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/supreme-court-acquits-accused-in-murder-case-holds-circumstantial-evidence-chain-broken-due-to-unreliable-last-seen-testimony-dubious-recoveries-under-section-27-and-lack-of-forensic-linkage/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T07:07:07+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case, Holds Circumstantial Evidence Chain Broken Due to Unreliable Last-Seen Testimony, Dubious Recoveries Under Section 27 and Lack of Forensic Linkage</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, supreme court of India, proof beyond reasonable doubt, benefit of doubt criminal law, criminal appeal Supreme Court 2026, Section 27 Evidence Act recovery, chain of circumstances doctrine, defective investigation acquittal, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda principles, Chhattisgarh murder case, circumstantial evidence law India, forensic evidence shortcomings India, last seen theory reliability, Section 302 IPC acquittal, Gautam Satnami case, recovery evidence legal validity, acquittal in murder case, criminal jurisprudence India, Supreme Court judgment on circumstantial evidence, hostile witnesses criminal trial, IPC Section 302 interpretation</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-48.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/congress-leader-pawan-khera-seeks-anticipatory-bail-in-telangana-high-court-over-fir-filed-by-assam-cms-wife-alleging-multiple-passports/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T07:02:29+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Congress Leader Pawan Khera Seeks Anticipatory Bail in Telangana High Court Over FIR Filed by Assam CM’s Wife Alleging Multiple Passports</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, supreme court of India, accident claim tribunal award, fatal accident compensation India, future prospects Pranay Sethi, Helen Rebello judgment, deduction in motor accident claims, motor vehicles act 1988 compensation, motor accident compensation India, personal expenses deduction law, multiplicand annual income rule, railway employee accident case, compensation enhancement Supreme Court, interest on compensation motor accident, loss of dependency calculation, Sushila vs Sudhakar case, Karnataka High Court MACT appeal, MACT compensation calculation</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-47.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/supreme-court-enhances-motor-accident-compensation-holds-50-salary-deduction-impermissible-merely-because-deceased-had-six-months-of-service-left-reiterates-annual-income-basis-for-multiplicand/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T05:29:25+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation, Holds 50% Salary Deduction Impermissible Merely Because Deceased Had Six Months of Service Left; Reiterates Annual Income Basis for Multiplicand</news:title><news:keywords>supreme court of India, accident claim tribunal award, fatal accident compensation India, future prospects Pranay Sethi, Helen Rebello judgment, deduction in motor accident claims, motor vehicles act 1988 compensation, motor accident compensation India, personal expenses deduction law, multiplicand annual income rule, railway employee accident case, compensation enhancement Supreme Court, Sushila vs Sudhakar case, Karnataka High Court MACT appeal, MACT compensation calculation, Supreme Court judgment 2026 motor accident</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-5.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/09/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-mechanical-order-directing-fir-registration-against-police-officers-under-section-1753-bnss-mandates-strict-compliance-with-safeguards-under-section-223-bnss-before/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T05:23:39+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Mechanical Order Directing FIR Registration Against Police Officers Under Section 175(3) BNSS; Mandates Strict Compliance with Safeguards Under Section 223 BNSS Before Proceeding Against Public Servants</news:title><news:keywords>rajasthan High court, Section 175(3) BNSS, judicial safeguards BNSS, abuse of criminal process India, Section 223 BNSS safeguards, retaliatory complaint law, cognizance against public servant law, natural justice public servants India, misuse of criminal law against officials, SC ST Act court procedure, protection of police officers from prosecution, police investigation duties law, FIR registration against public servants, mechanical order FIR quashed, speaking order requirement courts, preliminary inquiry requirement BNSS, criminal revision petition Rajasthan High Court, BNSS 2023 criminal procedure, Prashant Kaushik case</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-12.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
