https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/09/jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-upholds-recovery-of-excess-compensation-paid-in-land-acquisition-case-holds-inherent-powers-under-section-151-cpc-available-to-prevent-unjust-enrichment/Lawcutoren2026-05-09T03:48:31+00:00Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Upholds Recovery of Excess Compensation Paid in Land Acquisition Case, Holds Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Available to Prevent Unjust Enrichmentexcess compensation recovery with interest land acquisition case, unjust enrichment public exchequer doctrine, Jammu and Kashmir High Court land acquisition excess compensation recovery, no indefeasible right over excess compensation, compensation includes structures and amenities under acquisition law, review petition dismissed by Principal District Judge Anantnag, correction of arithmetical clerical mistake in compensation award, Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal judgment, recovery as arrears of land revenue direction, Section 17-B J&K Land Acquisition Act restitution, Ali Mohammad Dar v NHAI, public exchequer protection in land acquisition matters, Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction limited scope, inherent powers can be exercised after conclusion of proceedings, clerical error leading to double payment corrected, restitution principle under Section 144 CPC applied, recovery of excess public money land acquisition, Srinagar Jammu National Highway four laning compensation dispute, Section 151 CPC inherent powers to recover excess payment, National Highways Authority of India compensation litigation, CM(M) No 149 of 2026 Jammu Kashmir High Court, High Court not appellate under Article 227, Reference Court award deduction of amounts already received, interest at 6 percent on excess compensation recovery, Lawcutor land acquisition and constitutional law updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-09t092717.842.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/09/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-quash-pocso-proceedings-despite-subsequent-marriage-and-birth-of-child-emphasises-need-for-careful-scrutiny-in-such-cases/Lawcutoren2026-05-09T03:39:20+00:00Delhi High Court Refuses to Quash POCSO Proceedings Despite Subsequent Marriage and Birth of Child, Emphasises Need for Careful Scrutiny in Such CasesFIR under Sections 363 376 506 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, significant age difference relevant factor in POCSO quashing, Harmeet Singh v State NCT of Delhi applied, quashing of POCSO FIR requires exceptional circumstances, prosecution evidence concluded judgment reserved quashing denied, Delhi High Court POCSO quashing refused after marriage, careful scrutiny before quashing sexual offence FIR, marriage with prosecutrix not automatic ground for quashing, compromise in rape and POCSO case not sufficient, child victim supported prosecution case throughout trial, trial at fag end quashing petition dismissed, Sonu v State of NCT of Delhi, protection of child rights under POCSO Act, consensual relationship with minor and subsequent marriage, marriage cannot become stratagem to evade conviction, Delhi High Court criminal law update 2026, criminal proceedings not quashed despite settlement, FIR No 269 of 2022 PS Dwarka North, prosecutrix statement under Section 164 CrPC supported allegations, judicial scrutiny of victim consent and voluntariness, Justice Prateek Jalan judgment, inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in POCSO caseshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-09t092705.460.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/08/supreme-court-grants-default-bail-to-uapa-accused-holds-extension-of-investigation-period-illegal-for-non-compliance-with-mandatory-procedural-safeguards/Lawcutoren2026-05-08T17:51:11+00:00Supreme Court Grants Default Bail to UAPA Accused, Holds Extension of Investigation Period Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedural Safeguardsaccused not produced physically or virtually extension order illegal, Jigar v State of Gujarat relied upon, Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta JJ judgment, continuation of custody beyond statutory period illegal, mechanical remand extension orders set aside, UAPA investigation extension procedure, extension without production of accused invalid, High Court Jharkhand order set aside by Supreme Court, Section 167(2) CrPC default bail rights, Supreme Court on mandatory presence of accused during extension hearing, personal liberty under criminal procedure law, Section 167(2) CrPC safeguard personal liberty, criminal appeal allowed default bail granted, procedural safeguards in remand extension, right to statutory bail crystallised before chargesheet, default bail cannot be defeated by illegal extension, unlawful activities prevention act default bail, Lawcutor criminal law updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-08t231948.048.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/08/bombay-high-court-holds-employer-not-obliged-to-issue-relieving-letter-or-service-certificate-to-employee-who-resigns-in-breach-of-service-bond/Lawcutoren2026-05-08T17:46:06+00:00Bombay High Court Holds Employer Not Obliged to Issue Relieving Letter or Service Certificate to Employee Who Resigns in Breach of Service BondBombay High Court service bond judgment, Industrial Court interim order set aside Bombay High Court, aviation engineer employment dispute Bombay HC, employee left without serving 60 days notice, relieving letter denied after bond breach, service certificate after resignation acceptance, breach of minimum service tenure agreement, specialised Boeing B777 training employment bond, employer not bound to issue experience certificate, Amrit Pal Singh v Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd relied upon, Bharat Aviation Pvt Ltd v Rahul Sudhindra Soni, Justice Sandeep V Marne aviation employment case, liquidated damages recovery by employer, trained employee poaching concern aviation sector, employee resigned without notice service bond dispute, issuance of relieving letter consequential act, resignation in breach of contract consequences, specialised training agreement enforceability, unfair labour practice complaint Maharashtra MRTU PULP Act, unilateral resignation not automatically accepted, Bombay High Court labour law update 2026, Justice Marne employment contract ruling, three year service bond enforceablehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-08t231433.432.png?w=150