https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/30/delhi-high-court-sets-aside-removal-of-cwc-officer-holds-unexplained-money-transfer-alone-insufficient-for-bribery-finding-without-evidentiary-link-to-official-favour/Lawcutoren2026-04-30T05:58:29+00:00Delhi High Court Sets Aside Removal of CWC Officer; Holds Unexplained Money Transfer Alone Insufficient for Bribery Finding Without Evidentiary Link to Official Favourdisciplinary proceedings illegal gratification charge failure, reinstatement with continuity of service Delhi High Court, unexplained money transfer not proof of bribery India, penalty disproportionate minor misconduct India, departmental inquiry evidentiary standard preponderance probabilities, service law proportionality of punishment India, Rajesh Choudhary v Union of India judgment summary, inquiry report inconsistency disciplinary case law, bribery charge without quid pro quo not sustainable, judicial review disciplinary authority findings India, public servant corruption charge evidentiary requirement India, Delhi High Court CWC officer reinstatement case 2026, Sanjeev Narula judgment service jurisprudence, unexplained bank credits suspicion vs proof briberyhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-83.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/30/patna-high-court-upholds-disqualification-of-mukhiya-elected-from-ebc-reserved-seat-rules-inconsistent-caste-claims-impermissible-for-electoral-benefits/Lawcutoren2026-04-30T02:21:05+00:00Patna High Court Upholds Disqualification of Mukhiya Elected from EBC Reserved Seat; Rules Inconsistent Caste Claims Impermissible for Electoral BenefitsKoeri vs Dangi caste dispute Bihar Panchayat election, election from reserved seat invalid caste claim judgment, Manoj Prasad v State Election Commission judgment 2026, false caste certificate election disqualification India, inconsistent caste claims election law India, R Vishwanatha Pillai case caste certificate fraud, Patna High Court caste disqualification Mukhiya EBC case, Bihar Panchayat Raj Act Section 136(2) caste dispute, EBC reservation misuse case India, Union of India v N Murugesan principle caste claims, doctrine of approbate and reprobate election cases, CID enquiry caste verification Bihar case, caste verification revenue records evidentiary value India, caste scrutiny committee findings upheld High Court, caste identity fraud public office disqualification Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-11.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/30/supreme-court-holds-that-admission-of-claim-by-resolution-professional-does-not-constitute-acknowledgment-of-debt-under-section-18-of-limitation-act-quashes-cirp-admission-as-time-barred/Lawcutoren2026-04-30T02:14:32+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Admission of Claim by Resolution Professional Does Not Constitute Acknowledgment of Debt Under Section 18 of Limitation Act; Quashes CIRP Admission as Time-BarredCIRP admission time barred Supreme Court ruling, insolvency application dismissed as time barred India 2026, IBC Section 60(6) limitation exclusion explained, Supreme Court limitation IBC Section 7 judgment 2026, NCLT NCLAT orders set aside limitation grounds, insolvency law India limitation computation Supreme Court, COVID limitation extension Supreme Court impact insolvency cases, NPA date starting limitation IBC Supreme Court ruling, acknowledgment of debt requirements Section 18 Limitation Act India, Article 137 limitation IBC default date NPA principle, IRP admission not acknowledgment Section 18 Limitation Act, assignment of debt ARC limitation issues India, latest Supreme Court insolvency judgments India IBC limitationhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-82.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/29/supreme-court-acquits-two-convicts-in-karnataka-murder-case-clarifies-that-joint-simultaneous-disclosure-statements-by-multiple-accused-under-section-27-evidence-act-are-admissible-only-if-they-lead/Lawcutoren2026-04-29T12:00:38+00:00Supreme Court Acquits Two Convicts in Karnataka Murder Case; Clarifies That Joint/Simultaneous Disclosure Statements by Multiple Accused Under Section 27 Evidence Act Are Admissible Only If They Lead to Distinct Discoveries of Different Factsjoint recovery evidence inadmissible multiple accused India, Supreme Court Section 27 Evidence Act joint disclosure ruling 2026, Karnataka murder case acquittal Supreme Court 2026, Evidence Act Section 27 safeguards Supreme Court precedent, Anand Jakkappa Pujari v State of Karnataka case summary, simultaneous disclosure statements admissibility India law, criminal appeals 1864 of 2024 2180 of 2026 analysis, last seen theory insufficient conviction Supreme Court judgment, Nagamma v State of Karnataka 2025 Section 27 interpretation, circumstantial evidence incomplete chain acquittal Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-3-2.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/29/supreme-court-sets-aside-high-court-order-cancelling-bail-in-mp-excise-act-case-holds-that-stringent-conditions-under-section-4803-bnss-cannot-be-imposed-for-offences-punishable-with-less-than-seve/Lawcutoren2026-04-29T11:54:06+00:00Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Cancelling Bail in MP Excise Act Case; Holds That Stringent Conditions Under Section 480(3) BNSS Cannot Be Imposed for Offences Punishable With Less Than Seven Years’ ImprisonmentSection 439(2) CrPC cancellation of bail principles, bail conditions cannot exceed statutory limits Supreme Court, offences less than seven years bail conditions law India, criminal law BNSS 2023 latest judgments bail, liberty of accused protection Supreme Court ruling, Supreme Court bail cancellation BNSS Section 480(3) ruling 2026, stringent bail conditions BNSS applicability explained, MP Excise Act Section 34(2) bail judgment India, repeat offence ground bail cancellation rejected India, Section 483 BNSS bail cancellation scope India, Supreme Court restores bail wrong cancellation High Court, Narayan v State of Madhya Pradesh case summary, Madhya Pradesh Excise Act bail case Supreme Court, Section 480 BNSS interpretation bail jurisprudence India, Indian bail law latest updates 2026 Supreme Courthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-2-4.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/29/gujarat-high-court-quashes-attempt-to-murder-charge-against-six-accused-in-wedding-firing-case-holds-mere-celebratory-firing-in-air-without-intention-to-cause-injury-does-not-attract-section-307-ipc/Lawcutoren2026-04-29T11:33:39+00:00Gujarat High Court Quashes Attempt to Murder Charge Against Six Accused in Wedding Firing Case; Holds Mere Celebratory Firing in Air Without Intention to Cause Injury Does Not Attract Section 307 IPClegalnews, Arms Act charges continue but 307 IPC quashed, presumption vs proof intention criminal law India, customary wedding firing Darbar community legal view, celebratory firing no attempt to murder India judgment 2026, Sessions Court order set aside Gujarat High Court, intention requirement Section 307 IPC explained High Court, firing in air during marriage not attempt to murder, attempt to murder ingredients Indian criminal law explained, discharge under Section 227 CrPC Gujarat HC ruling, misuse of Section 307 IPC in celebratory firing cases, no injury no intention Section 307 IPC interpretation, Dilipsinh Rathod v State of Gujarat case summary, criminal revision application 135 of 2019 Ahmedabad High Court, Gujarat High Court Section 307 IPC quashed wedding firing case, latest criminal law judgments India 2026 Section 307 IPChttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-10.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/29/tripura-high-court-dismisses-writ-petition-of-tsr-rifleman-challenging-dismissal-from-service-holds-mere-incarceration-cannot-excuse-non-participation-in-departmental-proceedings-when-repeated-notice/Lawcutoren2026-04-29T11:26:33+00:00Tripura High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of TSR Rifleman Challenging Dismissal from Service; Holds Mere Incarceration Cannot Excuse Non-Participation in Departmental Proceedings When Repeated Notices Were Duly Served Through Jail Authoritiesfailure to avail statutory appeal writ petition dismissed India, ex parte inquiry valid when notices served jail authorities, natural justice departmental inquiry jail custody participation, repeated notices through jail authorities legal validity, unauthorized absence service law India TSR case, TSR Act 1983 section 12 dismissal judgment, Tripura High Court dismissal from service TSR rifleman 2026, Supreme Court precedents disciplinary inquiry scope judicial review, incarceration no excuse departmental proceedings India, dismissal from service upheld High Court service law, Union of India v P Gunasekaran service law ratio, Sonvir Singh v State of Tripura case summary, Article 226 judicial review disciplinary proceedings limits, B C Chaturvedi principles disciplinary matters India, ex parte disciplinary proceedings upheld Indian courtshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-73.png?w=150