https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/rajasthan-high-court-allows-application-under-section-311-crpc-directing-summoning-of-doctor-who-prepared-injury-report-holds-that-prosecutions-prerogative-cannot-deny-accused-opportunity-to-examin/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T17:51:03+00:00Rajasthan High Court Allows Application Under Section 311 CrPC Directing Summoning Of Doctor Who Prepared Injury Report, Holds That Prosecution’s Prerogative Cannot Deny Accused Opportunity To Examine Material Witness Essential For Just DecisionLawcutor, rajasthan High court, evidence law, Judicial Discretion, Criminal Procedure, Section 528 BNSS, Section 311 CrPC, Section 348 BNSS, IPC Sections 279 323 308 325 365 387 34, Criminal Trial, Doctor Testimony, Expert Witness, Just Decision Principle, Medical Evidence, Varsha Garg Case, Fair Trial Rights, Rajaram Prasad Yadav Case, Criminal Miscellaneous Petition, Material Witness, Summoning Witness, Trial Court Order Set Aside, FIR 243/2020, K P Tamilmaran Case, Justice Baljinder Singh Sandhu, Rajasthan High Court Judgmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-64.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/kerala-high-court-holds-unattested-alteration-in-will-has-no-legal-effect-and-grants-probate-by-excluding-tampered-portion-changing-bequest-from-sole-daughter-to-all-children/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T17:44:23+00:00Kerala High Court Holds Unattested Alteration in Will Has No Legal Effect and Grants Probate by Excluding Tampered Portion Changing Bequest from Sole Daughter to All ChildrenLawcutor, kerala high court, burden of proof, Indian Succession Act 1925, Testamentary Intent, Unprivileged Will, Section 71 Succession Act, Will Alteration, Probate Jurisdiction, Succession Dispute, Testamentary Law, Interlineation in Will, Civil Suit Conversion, Attestation Requirement, Legal Validity of Will, Alteration in Will, Section 299 Appeal, Property Inheritance, Probate Proceedings, Forensic Evidence, Execution of Will, Kerala High Court Judgment, Document Tampering, Section 295 Succession Act, Wills and Probate Lawhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-63.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/allahabad-high-court-holds-reference-court-under-land-acquisition-act-has-no-power-to-set-aside-collectors-award-and-remand-matter-for-fresh-determination/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T17:34:32+00:00Allahabad High Court Holds Reference Court Under Land Acquisition Act Has No Power To Set Aside Collector’s Award And Remand Matter For Fresh DeterminationLawcutor, allahabad high court, Administrative Law, judicial precedent, Civil Appeal, statutory interpretation, High Court judgment 2026, Appellate Jurisdiction, Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013, Land Acquisition Compensation, Power of Remand, Section 18 LA Act, Land Acquisition Act 1894, RFCTLARR Act, Reference Court, Jurisdiction of Reference Court, Special Land Acquisition Officer, Land Acquisition Case, Uttar Pradesh Land Acquisition, Chimanlal Hargovinddas Case, Original Jurisdiction, Property Acquisition, First Appeal, Justice Sandeep Jain, Compensation Enhancement, Collector Awardhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-62.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/madras-high-court-holds-remarriage-of-widow-does-not-extinguish-her-right-to-claim-compensation-in-motor-accident-cases/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T17:28:21+00:00Madras High Court Holds Remarriage of Widow Does Not Extinguish Her Right to Claim Compensation in Motor Accident CasesLawcutor, madras high court, Motor Vehicles Act 1988, motor accident compensation, Social Justice, Tribunal Award Upheld, Compensation After Remarriage, Legal Representative, Appellate Jurisdiction, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, MACT Award, Remarriage of Widow, Rash and Negligent Driving, Insurance Law, Compensation Law, Widow Compensation, Fatal Accident Claim, Pecuniary Loss, Dependency Principle, Loss of Dependency, Loss of Consortium, Road Accident Case, Section 166 MV Act, Justice M G Priyadarsini, Indian Courts Judgmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-61.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/rajasthan-high-court-criticizes-states-procedure-of-terminating-contractual-employee-without-inquiry-and-imposes-cost-of-rs-25000/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T17:22:08+00:00Rajasthan High Court Criticizes State’s Procedure of Terminating Contractual Employee Without Inquiry and Imposes Cost of Rs. 25,000Lawcutor, natural justice, rajasthan High court, writ petition, Article 226, continuity of service, Administrative Law, Justice Munnuri Laxman, back wages, Cost Imposed, service law, Departmental Enquiry, illegal termination, Stigmatic Termination, Fake News Case, Medical and Health Department, Loss to Exchequer, Contractual Employee, Revocation of Termination, COVID-19 Allegations, Mental Agony Compensation, Government Liability, Termination Without Enquiryhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-60.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/supreme-court-holds-that-bail-conditions-cannot-include-direction-to-sell-immovable-property-of-accused-for-settlement-of-alleged-claims-as-such-direction-is-alien-to-bail-jurisdiction/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T14:18:39+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Bail Conditions Cannot Include Direction To Sell Immovable Property Of Accused For Settlement Of Alleged Claims As Such Direction Is Alien To Bail Jurisdictionmadras high court, BNSS 2023, Criminal appeal, Bail Conditions, Judicial Discretion, Criminal Procedure, criminal breach of trust, Legal update India, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Supreme Court judgment 2026, Civil vs Criminal Jurisdiction, Bail Jurisdiction, Property Rights, Bail Law India, Cheating Case, Sale of Property, Conditions of Bail, IPC Sections 406 409 420 34https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-25.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/orissa-high-court-quashes-matrimonial-criminal-proceedings-under-sections-498-a-323-354-506-34-ipc-after-amicable-settlement-between-parties/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T08:18:54+00:00Orissa High Court Quashes Matrimonial Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498-A, 323, 354, 506 & 34 IPC After Amicable Settlement Between Partiesorissa high court, inherent powers high court, Section 528 BNSS, High Court judgment 2026, Manjit @ Mandeep Kaur v. State of Odisha, criminal case quashed, Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, CRLMC petition, criminal intimidation Section 506 IPC, domestic violence allegations, abuse of process of law, compromise in criminal cases, Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, matrimonial dispute settlement, quashing of criminal proceedings, assault Section 323 IPC, outraging modesty Section 354 IPC, Section 498A IPC, family dispute resolution, B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryanahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-24.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/supreme-court-enhances-wifes-maintenance-from-%e2%82%b915000-to-%e2%82%b925000-per-month-holds-that-loan-repayments-for-asset-creation-cannot-dilute-husbands-primary-maintenance-obligation/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T07:46:23+00:00Supreme Court Enhances Wife’s Maintenance From ₹15,000 To ₹25,000 Per Month, Holds That Loan Repayments For Asset Creation Cannot Dilute Husband’s Primary Maintenance Obligationmatrimonial disputes india, Supreme Court judgment 2026, alimony India, maintenance law India, family court maintenance order, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, maintenance enhancement, Deepa Joshi v. Gaurav Joshi, High Court Uttarakhand, wife maintenance rights, income assessment maintenance, family law India, spousal maintenance, dignified living standard, husband duty to maintain wife, Section 144 BNSS, loan repayment vs maintenance, maintenance quantum, Canara Bank employee case, arrears of maintenance, financial obligations lawhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-23.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/kerala-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-solely-on-ground-of-concealment-that-accused-was-abroad-at-the-time-of-filing-application/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T05:46:21+00:00Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail Solely On Ground Of Concealment That Accused Was Abroad At The Time Of Filing Applicationkerala high court, anticipatory bail, bharatiya nyaya sanhita 2023, bail jurisprudence India, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, sexual offences India, IT Act Section 66E, criminal procedure India, Anu Mathew v State of Kerala, discretionary relief bail, rape allegations law, bail rejection grounds, pre arrest bail India, premeditated crime, investigation stage bail, accused abroad bail, concealment of facts, Shahir Basheer v. State of Kerala, Section 482 BNSS, suppression of material facts, Kerala High Court judgment 2026, High Court bail orderhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-22.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/rajasthan-high-court-upholds-ex-parte-reinstatement-of-daily-wage-worker-holds-termination-without-complying-with-section-25-f-of-industrial-disputes-act-is-illegal/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T03:13:13+00:00Rajasthan High Court Upholds Ex-Parte Reinstatement Of Daily Wage Worker; Holds Termination Without Complying With Section 25-F Of Industrial Disputes Act Is Illegalrajasthan High court, continuity of service, Industrial Disputes Act 1947, reinstatement with back wages, worker protection laws India, illegal termination, retrenchment compensation, notice and compensation requirement, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Thatad v. Banshi Lal, daily wage worker rights, labour law India, Gram Panchayat employment, Rajasthan service law, Labour Court award, irregular appointment law, writ petition dismissal, natural justice in termination, public employment dispute, Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act, ex parte award, employment termination procedure, Rajasthan Regulation of Appointments Act 1999, Section 9 Rajasthan 1999 Act, High Court judgment 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-21.png?w=150