https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/09/jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-high-court-upholds-recovery-of-excess-compensation-paid-in-land-acquisition-case-holds-inherent-powers-under-section-151-cpc-available-to-prevent-unjust-enrichment/Lawcutoren2026-05-09T03:48:31+00:00Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court Upholds Recovery of Excess Compensation Paid in Land Acquisition Case, Holds Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Available to Prevent Unjust Enrichmentexcess compensation recovery with interest land acquisition case, unjust enrichment public exchequer doctrine, Jammu and Kashmir High Court land acquisition excess compensation recovery, no indefeasible right over excess compensation, compensation includes structures and amenities under acquisition law, review petition dismissed by Principal District Judge Anantnag, correction of arithmetical clerical mistake in compensation award, Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal judgment, recovery as arrears of land revenue direction, Section 17-B J&K Land Acquisition Act restitution, Ali Mohammad Dar v NHAI, public exchequer protection in land acquisition matters, Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction limited scope, inherent powers can be exercised after conclusion of proceedings, clerical error leading to double payment corrected, restitution principle under Section 144 CPC applied, recovery of excess public money land acquisition, Srinagar Jammu National Highway four laning compensation dispute, Section 151 CPC inherent powers to recover excess payment, National Highways Authority of India compensation litigation, CM(M) No 149 of 2026 Jammu Kashmir High Court, High Court not appellate under Article 227, Reference Court award deduction of amounts already received, interest at 6 percent on excess compensation recovery, Lawcutor land acquisition and constitutional law updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-09t092717.842.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/09/delhi-high-court-refuses-to-quash-pocso-proceedings-despite-subsequent-marriage-and-birth-of-child-emphasises-need-for-careful-scrutiny-in-such-cases/Lawcutoren2026-05-09T03:39:20+00:00Delhi High Court Refuses to Quash POCSO Proceedings Despite Subsequent Marriage and Birth of Child, Emphasises Need for Careful Scrutiny in Such CasesFIR under Sections 363 376 506 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act, significant age difference relevant factor in POCSO quashing, Harmeet Singh v State NCT of Delhi applied, quashing of POCSO FIR requires exceptional circumstances, prosecution evidence concluded judgment reserved quashing denied, Delhi High Court POCSO quashing refused after marriage, careful scrutiny before quashing sexual offence FIR, marriage with prosecutrix not automatic ground for quashing, compromise in rape and POCSO case not sufficient, child victim supported prosecution case throughout trial, trial at fag end quashing petition dismissed, Sonu v State of NCT of Delhi, protection of child rights under POCSO Act, consensual relationship with minor and subsequent marriage, marriage cannot become stratagem to evade conviction, Delhi High Court criminal law update 2026, criminal proceedings not quashed despite settlement, FIR No 269 of 2022 PS Dwarka North, prosecutrix statement under Section 164 CrPC supported allegations, judicial scrutiny of victim consent and voluntariness, Justice Prateek Jalan judgment, inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in POCSO caseshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-09t092705.460.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/08/supreme-court-grants-default-bail-to-uapa-accused-holds-extension-of-investigation-period-illegal-for-non-compliance-with-mandatory-procedural-safeguards/Lawcutoren2026-05-08T17:51:11+00:00Supreme Court Grants Default Bail to UAPA Accused, Holds Extension of Investigation Period Illegal for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Procedural Safeguardsaccused not produced physically or virtually extension order illegal, Jigar v State of Gujarat relied upon, Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta JJ judgment, continuation of custody beyond statutory period illegal, mechanical remand extension orders set aside, UAPA investigation extension procedure, extension without production of accused invalid, High Court Jharkhand order set aside by Supreme Court, Section 167(2) CrPC default bail rights, Supreme Court on mandatory presence of accused during extension hearing, personal liberty under criminal procedure law, Section 167(2) CrPC safeguard personal liberty, criminal appeal allowed default bail granted, procedural safeguards in remand extension, right to statutory bail crystallised before chargesheet, default bail cannot be defeated by illegal extension, unlawful activities prevention act default bail, Lawcutor criminal law updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-08t231948.048.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/08/bombay-high-court-holds-employer-not-obliged-to-issue-relieving-letter-or-service-certificate-to-employee-who-resigns-in-breach-of-service-bond/Lawcutoren2026-05-08T17:46:06+00:00Bombay High Court Holds Employer Not Obliged to Issue Relieving Letter or Service Certificate to Employee Who Resigns in Breach of Service BondBombay High Court service bond judgment, Industrial Court interim order set aside Bombay High Court, aviation engineer employment dispute Bombay HC, employee left without serving 60 days notice, relieving letter denied after bond breach, service certificate after resignation acceptance, breach of minimum service tenure agreement, specialised Boeing B777 training employment bond, employer not bound to issue experience certificate, Amrit Pal Singh v Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd relied upon, Bharat Aviation Pvt Ltd v Rahul Sudhindra Soni, Justice Sandeep V Marne aviation employment case, liquidated damages recovery by employer, trained employee poaching concern aviation sector, employee resigned without notice service bond dispute, issuance of relieving letter consequential act, resignation in breach of contract consequences, specialised training agreement enforceability, unfair labour practice complaint Maharashtra MRTU PULP Act, unilateral resignation not automatically accepted, Bombay High Court labour law update 2026, Justice Marne employment contract ruling, three year service bond enforceablehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-08t231433.432.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/delhi-high-court-upholds-maintenance-order-under-section-125-crpc-granting-liberal-interpretation-to-term-wife-in-second-marriage-without-formal-divorce-from-first-husband/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T16:56:31+00:00Delhi High Court Upholds Maintenance Order Under Section 125 CrPC Granting Liberal Interpretation to Term ‘Wife’ in Second Marriage Without Formal Divorce from First HusbandLawcutor family law update 2026, liberal interpretation of wife under Section 125 CrPC, revisional jurisdiction under Section 401 CrPC limited scope, Dwarika Prasad Satpathy v Bidyut Prava Dixit, husband aware of prior marriage cannot deny maintenance, Delhi High Court Section 125 CrPC maintenance judgment, maintenance granted despite prior marriage issue, beneficial legislation for dependent women, Badshah v Sou Urmila Badshah Godse cited, N Usha Rani v Moodudula Srinivas Supreme Court, cohabitation as husband and wife maintenance rights, Chanmuniya v Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha relied upon, revision petition dismissed in maintenance matter, RK v PS 2026 DHC 3870, Family Court Patiala House Courts Delhi, quantum of maintenance reasonable Delhi High Court, maintenance for deserted wife social welfare law, presumption of death first husband maintenance case, social justice purpose of Section 125 CrPC, litigation expenses under Section 125 CrPC, Hindu marriage and maintenance dispute Delhi, maintenance in void or irregular marriage cases, no perversity in maintenance order revisional courthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-07t222500.158.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/rajasthan-high-court-strongly-deplores-police-practice-of-public-parading-and-social-media-exposure-of-arrestees-issues-directions-to-safeguard-dignity-and-presumption-of-innocence/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T16:51:19+00:00Rajasthan High Court Strongly Deplores Police Practice of Public Parading and Social Media Exposure of Arrestees, Issues Directions to Safeguard Dignity and Presumption of Innocenceaccused dignity and fair trial rights India, Rajasthan High Court police parading accused judgment, police social media trial violation of Article 21, Articles 14 21 and 22 Constitution of India, safeguards against custodial abuse Supreme Court precedents, police SOP against sharing accused photos, humiliation of arrested persons by police, institutional humiliation by law enforcement, police circulating accused photos on social media, media trial and right to fair trial, Justice Farjand Ali judgment on dignity of accused, right to privacy of accused persons, extra judicial punishment by police condemned, presumption of innocence constitutional protection, public parading of accused unconstitutional, police accountability for violating SOPs, constitutional morality and criminal justice system, prohibition on degrading treatment of arrestees, reputation as part of Article 21, Islam Khan v State of Rajasthan 2026 RJ-JD 17927, BNSS no sanction for public humiliation of accused, Rajasthan Police social media conduct guidelines, social stigma due to police media exposure, Rajasthan High Court on custodial dignity, Lawcutor constitutional law update 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-07t221934.210.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/delhi-high-court-holds-husband-cannot-benefit-from-striking-off-wifes-defence-in-matrimonial-proceedings-when-he-himself-failed-to-pay-litigation-expenses-as-directed-by-family-court/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T16:45:04+00:00Delhi High Court Holds Husband Cannot Benefit from Striking Off Wife’s Defence in Matrimonial Proceedings When He Himself Failed to Pay Litigation Expenses as Directed by Family Courthusband cannot take advantage of own wrong, Delhi High Court family court appeal dismissed, litigation expenses and fair opportunity to defend, procedural delay in filing WS matrimonial case, Family Court discretion upheld by Delhi High Court, Sesh Nath Singh v Baidyabati Sheoraphuli Coop Bank Ltd cited, divorce petition under Section 13(1)(ia) HMA, Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Rajneesh Kumar Gupta judgment, delay in filing written statement condonable, Family Court Dwarka Delhi judgment upheld, Order VIII Rule 1 CPC directory not mandatory, striking off defence restored wife written statement, litigation expenses non payment family court, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 63/2026 Delhi High Court, wife deprived of defence due to non payment of litigation expenses, striking off defence family court proceedings, equitable relief in matrimonial proceedings, Delhi High Court matrimonial appeal 2026, matrimonial litigation procedural fairness, child custody with wife matrimonial dispute, Section 23 Hindu Marriage Act equitable principle, Lawcutor family law update 2026, revival of right to file written statement, Salem Advocate Bar Association v Union of India relied uponhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-07t221253.202.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/uttarakhand-high-court-grants-bail-to-accused-in-pocso-case-observing-consensual-relationship-between-adolescents-and-prolonged-incarceration/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T16:38:51+00:00Uttarakhand High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Observing Consensual Relationship Between Adolescents and Prolonged Incarcerationphysical relations consensual according to victim statement, friendship and consensual relationship bail order, statement under Section 183 BNSS considered for bail, Justice Alok Mahra bail order, consensual relationship between adolescents POCSO Act, best interest principle in POCSO cases, consensual adolescent relationship bail under POCSO, Justice Alok Mahra Uttarakhand High Court judgment, Section 5(l)/6 POCSO Act bail granted, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 65(1) and Section 88, liberal approach in POCSO bail cases, liberal bail approach for young accused, victim maturity and discernment considered by court, adolescent relationship criminal law India, POCSO Act and consensual teenage relationship jurisprudence, Delhi High Court Varun Kumar Singh v State relied upon, Uttarakhand High Court POCSO bail judgment, discretionary jurisdiction in stringent POCSO offences, BA1 No 2403 of 2025, minor prosecutrix voluntarily accompanied accused, prolonged incarceration young offender bail, High Court grants bail despite minor age, Tushar Sharma @ Tannu v State of Uttarakhandhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-07t220727.098.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/uttarakhand-state-consumer-commission-orders-jaguar-land-rover-india-ltd-to-refund-over-%e2%82%b91-65-crore-for-defective-defender-110-x-p400-vehicle/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T16:34:24+00:00Uttarakhand State Consumer Commission Orders Jaguar Land Rover India Ltd. to Refund Over ₹1.65 Crore for Defective Defender 110 X P400 VehicleDefender acceleration claim misleading advertisement, automobile manufacturing defects consumer protection law, defective vehicle refund with interest consumer court, Jaguar Defender structural defect case, authorised dealer exonerated in consumer dispute, consumer court orders refund for defective luxury car, deficiency in service Jaguar Land Rover India, premium SUV defects and compensation case, unfair trade practice automobile manufacturer, B.S. Manral member consumer commission judgment, Ms Kumkum Rani President consumer commission, Jaguar Land Rover India refund order consumer dispute, luxury car buyer rights India, litigation costs awarded against car manufacturer, Uttarakhand consumer court automobile litigation, M/s Eapro Global Limited v Shiva Motocorp Jaguar Land Rover, consumer protection against false automobile advertisements, defective Defender 110 X P400 judgment, Jaguar Land Rover misleading specifications case, vehicle spent over 40 days in service consumer case, Lawcutor consumer law update 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-07t220254.572.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/rajasthan-high-court-dismisses-writ-petition-challenging-jda-auction-holds-revenue-entry-based-on-order-passed-after-land-acquisition-stood-complete-cannot-confer-title-directs-jda-to-hand/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T16:28:35+00:00Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging JDA Auction — Holds Revenue Entry Based on Order Passed After Land Acquisition Stood Complete Cannot Confer Title; Directs JDA to Hand Over Possession to Highest BidderRajasthan High Court refuses interference with tribunal findings, Jaipur Development Authority commercial land auction case, JDA Tribunal order upheld by Rajasthan High Court, Section 125 Rajasthan Land Revenue Act 1956, supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 Constitution of India, land acquisition award and possession challenge rejected, A.M.B. Hotels Pvt Ltd highest bidder dispute, supervisory jurisdiction sparingly exercised, fiscal entries do not confer title after acquisition, transfer of acquired land prohibited Rajasthan law, land vested in JDA after acquisition proceedings, auction purchaser rights protected by High Court, Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act 1953 acquisition finalized, Lawcutor Rajasthan High Court update 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-100.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/07/supreme-court-rules-specific-performance-decree-becomes-inexecutable-on-failure-to-deposit-balance-sale-consideration-within-stipulated-time-leading-to-rescission-of-contract/Lawcutoren2026-05-07T09:30:07+00:00Supreme Court Rules Specific Performance Decree Becomes Inexecutable on Failure to Deposit Balance Sale Consideration Within Stipulated Time, Leading to Rescission of Contractexecuting court cannot extend time automatically, Supreme Court on reciprocal obligations in decree, Section 28 Specific Relief Act rescission of contract, failure to deposit balance sale consideration specific performance, rescission of contract under Section 28 Specific Relief Act, Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside by Supreme Court, Supreme Court specific performance decree inexecutable, decree holder failed to deposit consideration within time, earnest money refund with interest Supreme Court, sale deed execution balance consideration deadline, Justice Pankaj Mithal judgment specific performance, preliminary decree specific performance Supreme Court, delayed deposit of sale consideration execution petition, automatic dismissal of specific performance suit, specific performance decree conditional deposit requirement, P.R. Yelumalai v NM Ravi relied upon, Habban Shah v Sheruddin 2026 INSC 451, specific performance equitable discretionary relief, limitation and compliance in execution proceedings, Justice SVN Bhatti Supreme Court ruling, agricultural land agreement to sell dispute Haryanahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-99.png?w=150