<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/28/bombay-high-court-grants-regular-bail-in-ndps-case-holding-that-application-under-section-439-crpc-section-483-bnss-is-maintainable-for-claiming-default-bail-under-section-1672-crpc-section-187/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T10:39:57+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Bombay High Court Grants Regular Bail in NDPS Case Holding That Application Under Section 439 CrPC / Section 483 BNSS Is Maintainable for Claiming Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC / Section 187(3) BNSS When Grounds Are Pleaded; Observes Filing of Charge-Sheet Without FSL Report as “Strange Procedure&#8221;</news:title><news:keywords>commercial quantity NDPS bail exception default bail rule, incomplete chargesheet NDPS default bail India, Nagpur Bench bail without FSL report judgment, Jabir Kha v State of MP NDPS default bail issue, Section 167(2) CrPC default bail rights explained, regular bail treated as default bail India law, absence of chemical analysis report chargesheet validity, personal liberty vs technicalities criminal law India, FSL report mandatory chargesheet NDPS case law, Justice MM Nerlikar bail order analysis 2026, NDPS Act Section 37 vs default bail jurisprudence, Bombay High Court default bail NDPS Act 2026, Section 187(3) BNSS default bail interpretation</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-81.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/rajasthan-high-court-directs-bank-of-baroda-to-de-freeze-petitioners-account-except-for-disputed-cyber-fraud-amount-of-rs-1364-32-holds-that-freezing-entire-account-merely-because-a-small-s/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:34:39+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Rajasthan High Court Directs Bank of Baroda to De-Freeze Petitioner’s Account Except for Disputed Cyber Fraud Amount of Rs.1,364.32; Holds That Freezing Entire Account Merely Because a Small Sum Was Credited Is Arbitrary and Prejudicial</news:title></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-80.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/rajasthan-high-court-directs-hdfc-bank-to-de-freeze-petitioners-firm-account-except-for-disputed-cyber-fraud-amount-of-rs-177758-39-holds-that-freezing-entire-account-merely-on-account-of/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:16:48+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Rajasthan High Court Directs HDFC Bank to De-Freeze Petitioner’s Firm Account Except for Disputed Cyber Fraud Amount of Rs.1,77,758.39; Holds That Freezing Entire Account Merely on Account of a Single Transaction Is Arbitrary and Prejudicial to Business Rights</news:title><news:keywords>bank lien vs account freeze legal difference India, Indian courts on arbitrary bank account freezing, cyber crime investigation and bank account operation rights, Rajasthan High Court bank account defreeze order 2026, bank cannot freeze entire account partial lien principle India, cyber fraud bank account freezing legal position India, proportionality in bank account freezing court ruling, writ petition against bank account freeze India legal update, business account freeze relief High Court India</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-79.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/aam-aadmi-party-national-convenor-arvind-kejriwal-writes-to-delhi-high-court-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-declining-further-participation-in-cbi-liquor-policy-revision-petition-citing-grave-apprehens/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:03:28+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Aam Aadmi Party National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal Writes to Delhi High Court Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma Declining Further Participation in CBI Liquor Policy Revision Petition, Citing Grave Apprehensions of Bias and Invoking Gandhian Principles of Satyagraha</news:title><news:keywords>conflict of interest judiciary children government panel advocates, Satyagraha principle judiciary protest India legal news, Delhi High Court recusal rejection 20 April 2026 analysis, judicial impartiality and public confidence India courts, Kejriwal vs CBI legal battle latest news, criminal revision petition 134 2026 Delhi HC update, high profile political case judiciary independence India</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-78.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/27/delhi-high-court-holds-false-self-declaration-of-educational-qualification-in-nomination-affidavit-form-26-does-not-constitute-corrupt-practice-under-section-1234-of-rp-act-election-petition-challe/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T07:57:08+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Delhi High Court Holds False Self-Declaration of Educational Qualification in Nomination Affidavit/Form 26 Does Not Constitute Corrupt Practice Under Section 123(4) of RP Act; Election Petition Challenging 2020 Karol Bagh Polls Rendered Infructuous After 2025 Elections</news:title><news:keywords>Nand Ram Bagri v Jai Kishan distinction Delhi HC, Form 26 nomination affidavit legal effect India, Delhi High Court election petition 2026 judgment, candidate affidavit misrepresentation not corrupt practice, corrupt practice election law self declaration false statement, false affidavit educational qualification election law India, Vishesh Ravi election case Delhi HC ruling, publication requirement under section 123(4) RP Act, section 123(4) representation of people act interpretation, election petition infructuous term expired principle, non disclosure educational qualification election law India, Ajmera Shyam v Kova Laksmi Supreme Court election law, strict pleading requirement election petitions India</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-77.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>