<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/29/tripura-high-court-dismisses-writ-petition-of-tsr-rifleman-challenging-dismissal-from-service-holds-mere-incarceration-cannot-excuse-non-participation-in-departmental-proceedings-when-repeated-notice/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-29T11:26:33+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Tripura High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of TSR Rifleman Challenging Dismissal from Service; Holds Mere Incarceration Cannot Excuse Non-Participation in Departmental Proceedings When Repeated Notices Were Duly Served Through Jail Authorities</news:title><news:keywords>failure to avail statutory appeal writ petition dismissed India, ex parte inquiry valid when notices served jail authorities, natural justice departmental inquiry jail custody participation, repeated notices through jail authorities legal validity, unauthorized absence service law India TSR case, TSR Act 1983 section 12 dismissal judgment, Tripura High Court dismissal from service TSR rifleman 2026, Supreme Court precedents disciplinary inquiry scope judicial review, incarceration no excuse departmental proceedings India, dismissal from service upheld High Court service law, Union of India v P Gunasekaran service law ratio, Sonvir Singh v State of Tripura case summary, Article 226 judicial review disciplinary proceedings limits, B C Chaturvedi principles disciplinary matters India, ex parte disciplinary proceedings upheld Indian courts</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-73.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/28/bombay-high-court-grants-regular-bail-in-ndps-case-holding-that-application-under-section-439-crpc-section-483-bnss-is-maintainable-for-claiming-default-bail-under-section-1672-crpc-section-187/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T10:39:57+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Bombay High Court Grants Regular Bail in NDPS Case Holding That Application Under Section 439 CrPC / Section 483 BNSS Is Maintainable for Claiming Default Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC / Section 187(3) BNSS When Grounds Are Pleaded; Observes Filing of Charge-Sheet Without FSL Report as “Strange Procedure&#8221;</news:title><news:keywords>commercial quantity NDPS bail exception default bail rule, incomplete chargesheet NDPS default bail India, Nagpur Bench bail without FSL report judgment, Jabir Kha v State of MP NDPS default bail issue, Section 167(2) CrPC default bail rights explained, regular bail treated as default bail India law, absence of chemical analysis report chargesheet validity, personal liberty vs technicalities criminal law India, FSL report mandatory chargesheet NDPS case law, Justice MM Nerlikar bail order analysis 2026, NDPS Act Section 37 vs default bail jurisprudence, Bombay High Court default bail NDPS Act 2026, Section 187(3) BNSS default bail interpretation</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-81.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
