https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/kerala-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-solely-on-ground-of-concealment-that-accused-was-abroad-at-the-time-of-filing-application/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T05:46:21+00:00Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail Solely On Ground Of Concealment That Accused Was Abroad At The Time Of Filing Applicationkerala high court, anticipatory bail, bharatiya nyaya sanhita 2023, bail jurisprudence India, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, sexual offences India, IT Act Section 66E, criminal procedure India, Anu Mathew v State of Kerala, discretionary relief bail, rape allegations law, bail rejection grounds, pre arrest bail India, premeditated crime, investigation stage bail, accused abroad bail, concealment of facts, Shahir Basheer v. State of Kerala, Section 482 BNSS, suppression of material facts, Kerala High Court judgment 2026, High Court bail orderhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-22.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/rajasthan-high-court-upholds-ex-parte-reinstatement-of-daily-wage-worker-holds-termination-without-complying-with-section-25-f-of-industrial-disputes-act-is-illegal/Lawcutoren2026-04-18T03:13:13+00:00Rajasthan High Court Upholds Ex-Parte Reinstatement Of Daily Wage Worker; Holds Termination Without Complying With Section 25-F Of Industrial Disputes Act Is Illegalrajasthan High court, continuity of service, Industrial Disputes Act 1947, reinstatement with back wages, worker protection laws India, illegal termination, retrenchment compensation, notice and compensation requirement, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Thatad v. Banshi Lal, daily wage worker rights, labour law India, Gram Panchayat employment, Rajasthan service law, Labour Court award, irregular appointment law, writ petition dismissal, natural justice in termination, public employment dispute, Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act, ex parte award, employment termination procedure, Rajasthan Regulation of Appointments Act 1999, Section 9 Rajasthan 1999 Act, High Court judgment 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-21.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/16/supreme-court-refuses-to-entertain-habeas-corpus-petition-by-savukku-shankars-nephew-directs-him-to-approach-madras-high-court-for-quashing-third-goondas-act-detention-order/Lawcutoren2026-04-16T12:57:11+00:00Supreme Court Refuses To Entertain Habeas Corpus Petition By Savukku Shankar’s Nephew, Directs Him To Approach Madras High Court For Quashing Third Goondas Act Detention Orderpersonal liberty, madras high court, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, criminal writ petition, preventive detention, multiple FIRs, D. Bharath v. State of Tamil Nadu, fundamental rights India, Article 32 Constitution, Goondas Act Tamil Nadu, abuse of preventive detention, free speech India, Tamil Nadu police cases, habeas corpus petition, public order law, Supreme Court order 2026, detention order challenge, Savukku Shankar, YouTuber arrest India, judicial review detention, detention without trial, detention jurisprudence, constitutional remedieshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-2-1.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/16/supreme-court-holds-that-mere-non-execution-of-a-declaratory-decree-cannot-justify-a-31-year-delay-in-challenging-it-restores-1975-decree-granting-khatedari-rights-to-appellant/Lawcutoren2026-04-16T12:54:02+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Mere Non-Execution Of A Declaratory Decree Cannot Justify A 31-Year Delay In Challenging It; Restores 1975 Decree Granting Khatedari Rights To Appellantrajasthan High court, adverse inference, Delay Condonation, Civil Procedure, Supreme Court judgment 2026, declaratory decree, Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan, Board of Revenue Rajasthan, execution of decree, limitation law, civil appeal India, land encroachment dispute, Rajasthan Tenancy Act 1955, 31 year delay case, appeal after delay, khatedari rights, land dispute India, possession and title, fraud plea in civil cases, declaratory suit, revenue lawhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-7.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/16/supreme-court-restores-conviction-in-corruption-case-holds-that-testimony-of-hostile-witness-cannot-be-discarded-in-toto-and-creditworthy-portions-establishing-demand-and-acceptance-of-bribe-must-be/Lawcutoren2026-04-16T12:41:13+00:00Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Corruption Case, Holds That Testimony of Hostile Witness Cannot Be Discarded in Toto and Creditworthy Portions Establishing Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Must Be Acted UponCriminal Law, Corruption Case, evidence law, burden of proof, Indian Evidence Act, prevention of corruption act 1988, criminal jurisprudence, phenolphthalein test, appreciation of evidence, trap proceedings, vigilance trap, demand and acceptance, conviction restored, hostile witness, India Supreme Court judgment, public servant corruption, Sat Paul case, witness credibility, hostile witness testimony, acquittal set aside, bribe case, corroborative evidencehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-20.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/16/supreme-court-mandates-binding-standard-operating-procedure-to-eliminate-delays-in-legal-aid-appeals/Lawcutoren2026-04-16T11:15:58+00:00Supreme Court Mandates Binding Standard Operating Procedure to Eliminate Delays in Legal Aid AppealsSupreme Court Legal Services Committee reforms SOP, monitoring committees legal aid India judiciary, Indian judiciary systemic reforms 2026, legal aid appeal timelines Supreme Court SOP, delay in filing SLP legal aid prisoners India, NIC digital platform legal services India, Supreme Court legal aid SOP 2026 Shankar Mahto case, Article 21 access to justice prisoners rights, digitisation of court records legal aid cases, prisoners right to appeal without delay India, translation delay criminal appeals India law, death row convicts appeal delay Supreme Court case, Suhas Chakma vs Union of India precedent legal aid, legal services authorities accountability India, jail reforms legal aid coordination India, criminal justice delays India Supreme Court reforms, priority classification criminal appeals SOP India, Article 39A free legal aid implementation India, High Court Legal Services Committee reforms India, access to justice legal aid India Supreme Courthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-19.png?w=150