https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/13/supreme-court-holds-that-clear-and-unequivocal-admission-by-defendant-in-criminal-proceedings-acknowledging-plaintiffs-ownership-and-his-own-status-as-mere-caretaker-constitutes-sufficient-ba/Lawcutoren2026-05-13T12:56:30+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Clear and Unequivocal Admission by Defendant in Criminal Proceedings Acknowledging Plaintiff’s Ownership and His Own Status as Mere Caretaker Constitutes Sufficient Basis for Passing Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for Delivery of Possessionadmission outside pleadings valid under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, decree on admissions under CPC, decree for possession without full trial, Delhi property possession dispute Supreme Court, judgment on admission by Supreme Court 2026, Uttam Singh Duggal precedent on admissions, execution proceedings to continue expeditiously, concurrent findings upheld by Supreme Court, Sheikh Abedin v Iqbal Ahmed Supreme Court, caretaker cannot claim ownership rights, Supreme Court Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment, possession decree on admission, mandatory injunction for possession based on admission, caretaker directed to vacate property, plaintiffs ownership admitted by defendant, Delhi High Court possession decree affirmed, civil procedure code Order XII Rule 6 explained, clear and unequivocal admission principle, mandatory injunction decree upheld, no interference with concurrent findings, Supreme Court dismisses SLP in possession case, admission can be oral or written under CPC, civil litigation based on admissions, caretaker occupation dispute law, Jamia Nagar Okhla property dispute, legal effect of admissions in court proceedings, speedy justice through admissions under CPC, Order 12 Rule 6 CPC latest judgment, Lawcutor civil procedure updatehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-13t182443.202.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/13/uttarakhand-high-court-acquits-accused-in-pocso-case-citing-failure-of-prosecution-to-establish-proper-identification-of-accused-and-inadmissibility-of-fsl-dna-report-not-confronted-to-accused-under-s/Lawcutoren2026-05-13T12:46:03+00:00Uttarakhand High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Citing Failure of Prosecution to Establish Proper Identification of Accused and Inadmissibility of FSL/DNA Report Not Confronted to Accused Under Section 313 CrPCLawcutor criminal law update, Sections 363 377 506 IPC acquittal, medical evidence insufficient for conviction, Section 4 POCSO Act acquittal, DNA evidence not put to accused under Section 313 CrPC, identification in darkness unreliable, inadmissibility of unproved incriminating material, victim testimony lacking corroboration, FSL report cannot be relied without confronting accused, benefit of doubt in criminal trial, acquittal due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence, procedural safeguards in criminal law, appellate court reappreciation of evidence, Mohit Tyagi v State of Uttarakhand, fair trial rights of accused under CrPC, Section 313 CrPC incriminating evidence principle, Justice Ravindra Maithani judgment, latest Uttarakhand High Court criminal law judgment 2026, prosecution failed to prove case beyond reasonable doubt, Justice Siddhartha Sah criminal appeal, POCSO conviction overturned by High Court, FSL DNA matching not sufficient alone, no test identification parade conducted, importance of test identification parade in criminal cases, criminal conviction set aside due to procedural lapseshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-13t181405.966.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/13/jk-and-ladakh-high-court-holds-that-repeated-representations-to-the-department-do-not-furnish-fresh-cause-of-action-nor-revive-a-stale-claim-dismisses-review-petition-challenging-dismissal-of-wr/Lawcutoren2026-05-13T12:39:04+00:00J&K and Ladakh High Court Holds That Repeated Representations to the Department Do Not Furnish Fresh Cause of Action Nor Revive a Stale Claim; Dismisses Review Petition Challenging Dismissal of Writ Petition on Ground of Delay and Laches in Seniority Matterstale claims under Article 226 Constitution, writ petition dismissed on delay grounds, challenge to seniority fixation after 17 years, stale service claims Supreme Court precedents, rejection of representation not fresh cause of action, filing representations does not extend limitation period, repeated representations do not create fresh cause of action, Jharkhand High Court withdrawal no benefit, service law delay and laches principles, perpetual cause of action argument rejected, delay defeats equity in service matters, Jammu and Kashmir High Court delay and laches judgment, service jurisprudence limitation principles, Justice Sanjay Dhar judgment 2026, legal effect of repeated departmental representations, State of Uttaranchal v Shiv Charan Singh Bhandari cited, seniority dispute dismissed due to delay, review petition dismissed J&K High Court, review jurisdiction error apparent on face of record, discretionary relief under Article 226, State of Tamil Nadu v Seshachalam relied upon, CRPF Assistant Commandant seniority case, Lawcutor service law update, C Jacob v Director of Geology and Mining applied, inter se seniority rights crystallized, review petition bereft of merit, affected parties not impleaded in seniority disputehttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-13t180727.462.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/13/supreme-court-upholds-conviction-for-murder-under-section-302-ipc-based-on-reliable-dying-declaration-and-corroborative-testimony-holds-that-quality-and-not-quantity-of-evidence-is-determinative-and/Lawcutoren2026-05-13T06:52:13+00:00Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Reliable Dying Declaration and Corroborative Testimony, Holds That Quality and Not Quantity of Evidence is Determinative and Conviction Can Be Based on Solitary Reliable WitnessLawcutor criminal law update, Mitesh @ TV Vaghela v State of Gujarat, Section 302 IPC murder case judgment, reliable eyewitness testimony criminal conviction, Supreme Court murder conviction upheld 2026, oral dying declaration conviction Supreme Court, mens rea and actus reus proved, Justice Aravind Kumar criminal law judgment, quality not quantity of evidence principle, Section 135 Bombay Police Act conviction, conviction based on dying declaration upheld, conviction beyond reasonable doubt standard, concurrent findings of trial court and high court upheld, PW-12 eyewitness account found credible, remission liberty granted to convict, eyewitness corroboration in murder trial, dying declaration made to brother accepted as evidence, medical evidence supporting prosecution case, Supreme Court on minor contradictions in evidence, hostile witnesses not fatal to prosecution case, knife recovery corroborates prosecution case, criminal jurisprudence on dying declarations, solitary witness can sustain conviction, oral dying declaration admissibility India, PW-1 testimony relied upon by Supreme Court, Justice Prasanna B Varale Supreme Court ruling, appeal against life sentence dismissed, oral dying declaration legal validity, Supreme Court criminal law precedent 2026, evidentiary value of hostile witnesses, latest Supreme Court murder judgment India, Indian Evidence Act dying declaration principles, murder after quarrel at tea stall, criminal evidence appreciation by Supreme Courthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-13t121946.037.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/13/supreme-court-expunges-findings-of-cruelty-and-desertion-recorded-against-wife-for-pursuing-professional-career-and-prioritising-childs-welfare-holds-such-conduct-cannot-be-treated-as-matrim/Lawcutoren2026-05-13T06:45:46+00:00Supreme Court Expunges Findings of Cruelty and Desertion Recorded Against Wife for Pursuing Professional Career and Prioritising Child’s Welfare, Holds Such Conduct Cannot Be Treated as Matrimonial Offencemarriage does not eclipse individuality of woman, Supreme Court expunges cruelty findings against wife, women professional identity not subject to spousal veto, Indian divorce law latest judgment, wife pursuing career not cruelty, dentist wife career rights judgment, matrimonial law and women independence, spouse career aspirations protected by Supreme Court, Supreme Court irretrievable breakdown of marriage judgment, Supreme Court on gender equality in marriage, archaic societal assumptions about married women criticised, wife staying with parents not cruelty, Supreme Court on women autonomy in marriage, divorce granted on irretrievable breakdown of marriage, Supreme Court rejects regressive view on wife career, ultra conservative mindset in family court judgment, Supreme Court family law ruling 2026, Article 14 and dignity of women in marriage, Justice Sandeep Mehta matrimonial judgment 2026, opening dental clinic not cruelty under matrimonial law, husband military posting and matrimonial disputes, Supreme Court on matrimonial autonomy, Family Court regressive observations criticised, military family divorce dispute Supreme Court, professional woman cannot be forced to sacrifice career after marriage, Supreme Court modern approach to marriage and women rights, cruelty and desertion findings set aside, constitutional values in family law, Lawcutor matrimonial law update, personal vendetta in matrimonial litigation, irretrievable breakdown doctrine India, women empowerment and matrimonial jurisprudence, Supreme Court on wife independence after marriage, Section 340 CrPC perjury plea dismissedhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-13t121451.991.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/12/assistant-legal-counsel-at-yes-bank-mumbai/Lawcutoren2026-05-12T15:05:20+00:00Assistant Legal Counsel at YES Bank, Mumbaiin-house counsel jobs India, legal officer jobs bank, risk mitigation legal jobs, legal advisor bank jobs, legal associate banking sector, RBI compliance jobs, banking contracts and documentation, banking legal jobs India, arbitration and litigation banking, banking legal advisory role, LLB jobs India, LLM jobs banking sector, banking law careers, YES BANK careers, corporate legal jobs India, legal drafting jobs India, banking and finance lawyer jobs, banking litigation jobs, private bank legal jobs, YES BANK recruitment 2026, financial services legal jobs, legal vacancies YES BANK, NBFC legal jobs, banking operations legal support, legal jobs for advocates, contract management legal jobs, bank legal department jobs, jobs for law graduates India, commercial contracts lawyer, banking regulation act jobs, YES BANK legal jobs, financial law careers India, legal compliance banking sector, regulatory compliance lawyer, corporate counsel banking, legal support banking business, legal analyst banking, legal openings in private banks, banking corporate legal team, corporate law banking jobs, legal careers financial institutions, legal risk management banking, YES BANK legal departmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/13606436_10153555298537610_3762280275164299121_n.webp?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/12/18369/Lawcutoren2026-05-12T13:55:06+00:00Supreme Court Directs Rajasthan to Grant Rajasthani Language Official Educational StatusArticle 19(1)(a) language rights, Rajasthani language recognition, Rajasthan education policy Rajasthani, Justice Sandeep Mehta judgment, Supreme Court constitutional language rights, mother tongue instruction Supreme Court, Supreme Court Rajasthani language judgment, Padam Mehta vs State of Rajasthan, REET 2021 Rajasthani language case, education in mother tongue judgment, Rajasthan schools Rajasthani language, Rajasthani as medium of instruction, 2026 INSC 476, Supreme Court mother tongue education ruling, RTE Act mother tongue provision, Rajasthan government language policy, regional languages in education system, language rights jurisprudence India, NEP 2020 regional language education, Rajasthani language constitutional status, regional language education India, pedagogical importance of mother tongue, Rajasthani universities recognition, Supreme Court on educational rights, local language medium of instruction, Eighth Schedule and education rights, Rajasthan High Court PIL language case, constitutional governance and language rights, University of Rajasthan Rajasthani language, Indian constitutional law language policy, Jai Narain Vyas University Rajasthani, linguistic rights in India, Rajasthani subject in schoolshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2026-05-12t193621.161.png?w=150