<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/13/allahabad-high-court-holds-that-freezing-of-entire-bank-account-under-section-106-bnss-in-cyber-crime-cases-is-impermissible-seizure-must-be-confined-to-suspected-amount-only-and-banks-are-obligated/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-13T03:46:30+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Allahabad High Court Holds That Freezing Of Entire Bank Account Under Section 106 BNSS In Cyber Crime Cases Is Impermissible; Seizure Must Be Confined To Suspected Amount Only And Banks Are Obligated To Inform Account Holders Post-Seizure</news:title><news:keywords>allahabad high court, Lawcutor updates, bank account seizure limits, teesta setalvad case law, freezing bank account law, criminal procedure bnss 2023, natural justice bank freezing, rights of account holders, cyber fraud cases india, seizure of property bnss, cyber crime investigation india, section 107 bnss attachment, police powers seizure bank accounts, partial freezing bank account, tapasd neogy case law, banking law india, investigation powers police, due process criminal law, cyber law india, financial rights india, section 106 bnss, unlawful freezing bank accounts</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-6.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/13/rajasthan-high-court-sets-aside-revisional-court-order-directing-framing-of-charges-in-theft-case-reiterates-that-even-at-stage-of-framing-charge-judicial-order-must-reflect-conscious-application-of/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-13T02:47:56+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Rajasthan High Court Sets Aside Revisional Court Order Directing Framing of Charges in Theft Case, Reiterates That Even at Stage of Framing Charge, Judicial Order Must Reflect Conscious Application of Mind and Cannot Be Cryptic or Mechanical</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, Lawcutor updates, rajasthan High court, framing of charges, criminal jurisprudence India, mechanical orders court, trial court discharge, judicial application of mind, prima facie case law, criminal revision jurisdiction, section 397 crpc principles, bnss criminal procedure india, grave suspicion vs mere suspicion, theft case ipc sections 454 457 380 201, procedural safeguards accused, criminal litigation india, discharge of accused, abuse of process criminal law, revisional powers criminal law, section 401 crpc scope, criminal law precedents india, revisional court limits</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-15.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/11/supreme-court-reiterates-that-adjudicating-authority-under-ibc-need-not-examine-merits-of-pre-existing-dispute-sets-aside-nclat-order-admitting-section-9-application-and-restores-nclt-order-dismissin/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-11T14:01:06+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Reiterates That Adjudicating Authority Under IBC Need Not Examine Merits of Pre-Existing Dispute; Sets Aside NCLAT Order Admitting Section 9 Application and Restores NCLT Order Dismissing It</news:title><news:keywords>Lawcutor, Lawcutor updates, supreme court of India, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, section 9 ibc, national company law tribunal, commercial litigation india, insolvency law india, ibc jurisprudence india, cirp admission criteria, insolvency and bankruptcy code 2016, nclat powers, insolvency proceedings india, dispute prior to demand notice, rejection of section 9 application, plausible dispute test, mobilox innovations vs kirusa software, nclt jurisdiction, national company law appellate tribunal, operational creditor vs corporate debtor, debt recovery disputes</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-14.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
