<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/06/delhi-high-court-holds-chief-ministers-assurance-in-press-conference-not-legally-enforceable-without-formal-policy-or-statutory-backing-quashes-single-judge-order-making-promise-to-pay-rent-for-poo/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-06T14:45:25+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Delhi High Court Holds Chief Minister&#8217;s Assurance in Press Conference Not Legally Enforceable Without Formal Policy or Statutory Backing; Quashes Single Judge Order Making Promise to Pay Rent for Poor Tenants Enforceable</news:title><news:keywords>COVID-19 rent relief legal case India, writ of mandamus requirements India law, CM press conference legal enforceability India, policy decision vs political statement law, public law mandamus limitation India, administrative law enforceability of promises India, Delhi HC rent payment migrant tenants case, Arvind Kejriwal rent assurance judgment, government liability for public promises India, Delhi High Court CM promise rent case, government promise without policy enforceable or not, DDMA order rent lockdown tenants Delhi, executive assurance vs statutory backing India, promissory estoppel Delhi High Court 2026, Chief Minister statement legal status India, Delhi rent lockdown litigation case, judicial review executive assurances India, Najma case Delhi High Court LPA 349 2021, rent waiver lockdown legal framework India</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-39.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/05/supreme-court-holds-toll-on-national-highways-falls-exclusively-under-union-list-dismisses-challenge-to-fee-collection-framework/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T04:08:14+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Holds Toll on National Highways Falls Exclusively Under Union List; Dismisses Challenge to Fee Collection Framework</news:title><news:keywords>NHAI toll collection legality Supreme Court, highway user fee legal framework India, Entry 59 List II toll interpretation, Entry 23 List I highways law, toll vs tax constitutional law India, concessionaire toll collection legal India, national highways toll Union List India, fee for use of national highways law, pith and substance doctrine toll case, Entry 96 List I fees Constitution India, constitutional validity toll collection India, Supreme Court toll tax national highways case, legislative competence toll collection India, Supreme Court service law and taxation distinction, Union vs State powers highways toll, Article 246 distribution of powers India, Madras High Court toll case upheld, infrastructure law India highways toll, National Highways Fee Rules 2008 validity, toll collection jurisdiction India</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-4.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/05/supreme-court-permits-irs-officer-sameer-wankhede-to-file-reply-to-chargesheet-in-disciplinary-proceedings-directs-fresh-decision-on-appointment-of-inquiry-officer-and-presenting-officer/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T03:54:18+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Permits IRS Officer Sameer Wankhede to File Reply to Chargesheet in Disciplinary Proceedings; Directs Fresh Decision on Appointment of Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officer</news:title><news:keywords>inquiry officer appointment disciplinary law, IRS officer disciplinary proceedings India, Central Administrative Tribunal Wankhede promotion case, Supreme Court service jurisprudence 2026, presenting officer appointment rules India, Wankhede vs Union of India case, Supreme Court Sameer Wankhede case, IRS officer misconduct proceedings India, Delhi High Court Wankhede case 2026, principles of natural justice disciplinary proceedings, Sameer Wankhede chargesheet Supreme Court order, chargesheet quashing Supreme Court law, service law India latest judgment, opportunity to reply chargesheet law, Cordelia cruise drug bust case India, government servant inquiry procedure India, Supreme Court disciplinary inquiry fairness, judicial review chargesheet India, fair hearing before inquiry officer appointment</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-9.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>