https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/05/supreme-court-holds-toll-on-national-highways-falls-exclusively-under-union-list-dismisses-challenge-to-fee-collection-framework/Lawcutoren2026-04-05T04:08:14+00:00Supreme Court Holds Toll on National Highways Falls Exclusively Under Union List; Dismisses Challenge to Fee Collection FrameworkNHAI toll collection legality Supreme Court, highway user fee legal framework India, Entry 59 List II toll interpretation, Entry 23 List I highways law, toll vs tax constitutional law India, concessionaire toll collection legal India, national highways toll Union List India, fee for use of national highways law, pith and substance doctrine toll case, Entry 96 List I fees Constitution India, constitutional validity toll collection India, Supreme Court toll tax national highways case, legislative competence toll collection India, Supreme Court service law and taxation distinction, Union vs State powers highways toll, Article 246 distribution of powers India, Madras High Court toll case upheld, infrastructure law India highways toll, National Highways Fee Rules 2008 validity, toll collection jurisdiction Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-1-4.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/05/supreme-court-permits-irs-officer-sameer-wankhede-to-file-reply-to-chargesheet-in-disciplinary-proceedings-directs-fresh-decision-on-appointment-of-inquiry-officer-and-presenting-officer/Lawcutoren2026-04-05T03:54:18+00:00Supreme Court Permits IRS Officer Sameer Wankhede to File Reply to Chargesheet in Disciplinary Proceedings; Directs Fresh Decision on Appointment of Inquiry Officer and Presenting Officerinquiry officer appointment disciplinary law, IRS officer disciplinary proceedings India, Central Administrative Tribunal Wankhede promotion case, Supreme Court service jurisprudence 2026, presenting officer appointment rules India, Wankhede vs Union of India case, Supreme Court Sameer Wankhede case, IRS officer misconduct proceedings India, Delhi High Court Wankhede case 2026, principles of natural justice disciplinary proceedings, Sameer Wankhede chargesheet Supreme Court order, chargesheet quashing Supreme Court law, service law India latest judgment, opportunity to reply chargesheet law, Cordelia cruise drug bust case India, government servant inquiry procedure India, Supreme Court disciplinary inquiry fairness, judicial review chargesheet India, fair hearing before inquiry officer appointmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-9.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/04/allahabad-high-court-quashes-cancellation-of-petrol-pump-dealership-letter-of-intent-holds-typographical-error-in-road-classification-mdr-vs-odr-cannot-justify-withdrawal-after-dealer-incurs-substa/Lawcutoren2026-04-04T09:21:53+00:00Allahabad High Court Quashes Cancellation of Petrol Pump Dealership Letter of Intent; Holds Typographical Error in Road Classification (MDR vs ODR) Cannot Justify Withdrawal After Dealer Incurs Substantial Expenditure and Legitimate Expectation Arisesallahabad high court, legitimate expectation doctrine India, writ petition BPCL LOI quashed, typographical error advertisement law, BPCL dealership case, public authority fairness rule of law, petrol pump dealership cancellation case, judicial review administrative action India, promissory estoppel legitimate expectation India, retail outlet dealership judgment India, administrative law India latest judgment, dealership allotment dispute India, MDR vs ODR typographical mistake case, High Court quashes arbitrary cancellation, government contracts judicial review India, petrol pump allotment legal case India, rule of law fairness expectations case, Article 14 arbitrarinesshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-38.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/04/supreme-court-upholds-nfu-to-level-9-for-junior-engineers-in-bro-pay-parity-victory-after-years-of-stagnation/Lawcutoren2026-04-04T09:12:45+00:00Supreme Court Upholds NFU to Level 9 for Junior Engineers in BRO: Pay Parity Victory After Years of StagnationLawcutor, Supreme Court, Delhi High Court judgment, service jurisprudence India, Grade Pay 5400, MACP Scheme, Border Roads Organisation, government employees pay scale, service law India, central government employees benefits, Paragraph 7.4.13(iv)(b), non functional upgradation, pay commission benefits India, seniority cum suitability, NFU Level 9, 7th Central Pay Commission, equal pay benefits, stagnation in service, Level 8 to Level 9 promotionhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-37.png?w=150