https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/jk-and-ladakh-high-court-call-detail-records-showing-contact-between-accused-and-co-accused-not-sufficient-to-establish-nexus-with-drug-trafficking-in-absence-of-voice-recordings-or-transcripts/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T17:03:28+00:00J&K and Ladakh High Court: Call Detail Records Showing Contact Between Accused and Co-Accused Not Sufficient to Establish Nexus with Drug Trafficking in Absence of Voice Recordings or Transcripts; Rigors of Section 37 NDPS Act Not Applicable Where No Contraband Recovered from AccusedNDPS Act Section 29 conspiracy proof requirement India courts, disclosure statement co accused inadmissible NDPS Tofan Singh principle, three years custody bail granted NDPS case India, drug trafficking nexus proof standards Indian courts NDPS, NDPS bail jurisprudence India reasonable grounds test Section 37, bail conditions NDPS High Court GPS location passport surrender, Section 67 NDPS statement inadmissibility Supreme Court precedent, no contraband recovery bail NDPS case High Court ruling, Abdul Rashid Kohli v UT of J&K bail judgment analysis, call detail records CDR evidence conspiracy NDPS law India, Jammu Kashmir High Court NDPS bail CDR evidence insufficient 2026, criminal conspiracy proof NDPS Act phone records insufficient evidence, Lawcutor NDPS bail case analysis Jammu Kashmir High Court 2026https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-92.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/punjab-and-haryana-high-court-holds-that-second-anticipatory-bail-petition-is-not-maintainable-when-accused-is-already-on-regular-bail-and-no-substantial-change-in-circumstances-is-shown-after-dismiss/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T16:56:43+00:00Punjab and Haryana High Court Holds That Second Anticipatory Bail Petition Is Not Maintainable When Accused Is Already On Regular Bail And No Substantial Change In Circumstances Is Shown After Dismissal Of Earlier Petitionsecond anticipatory bail petition dismissal High Court reasoning, Pradeep Ram v State of Jharkhand anticipatory bail principle, Gurtej Singh Brar v State of Punjab case analysis, Manish Jain v Haryana SPCB anticipatory bail maintainability, anticipatory bail after charge alteration murder case India, Section 302 added during trial anticipatory bail issue, criminal law India change in circumstances anticipatory bail rejection, BNSS 2023 anticipatory bail scope and limitations Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-91.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/supreme-court-holds-that-corporate-veil-can-be-lifted-in-cirp-of-holding-company-to-include-assets-of-subsidiary-companies-for-completion-of-stalled-real-estate-projects-and-protection-of-homebuyers/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T16:49:22+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Corporate Veil Can Be Lifted In CIRP Of Holding Company To Include Assets Of Subsidiary Companies For Completion Of Stalled Real Estate Projects And Protection Of HomebuyersEarth Infrastructures Limited CIRP resolution plan Supreme Court, GNIDA dues resolution plan Supreme Court no penal interest, insolvency and bankruptcy code group company jurisprudence India, special purpose vehicle SPV insolvency treatment Supreme Court India, Alpha Corp Development Pvt Ltd v Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority judgment, Supreme Court group insolvency lifting corporate veil real estate 2026, real estate stalled projects resolution insolvency Supreme Court India, corporate veil lifting for homebuyers protection Supreme Court, NCLT orders restored Supreme Court group insolvency case analysishttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-90.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/supreme-court-holds-that-magistrate-has-no-jurisdiction-to-invoke-section-1563-crpc-for-the-second-time-after-earlier-dismissal-and-when-high-court-liberty-was-confined-to-filing-private-complaint-u/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T12:23:51+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Magistrate Has No Jurisdiction To Invoke Section 156(3) CrPC For The Second Time After Earlier Dismissal And When High Court Liberty Was Confined To Filing Private Complaint Under Section 200 CrPCcriminal procedure law India investigation vs complaint distinction, criminal complaint after dismissal of 156(3) application Supreme Court, reopening investigation via second 156(3) application barred, second application under Section 156(3) CrPC impermissible Supreme Court, abuse of process second 156(3) application review attempt, judicial review limits in criminal proceedings India, High Court liberty limited to Section 200 complaint interpretation, Supreme Court criminal appeal 2193 of 2026 analysishttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-89.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/calcutta-high-court-quashes-criminal-proceedings-against-father-accused-of-assaulting-minor-son-during-court-ordered-visitation-holding-allegations-inherently-improbable-lacking-mens-rea-and-based-sol/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T12:17:08+00:00Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Father Accused Of Assaulting Minor Son During Court Ordered Visitation Holding Allegations Inherently Improbable Lacking Mens Rea And Based Solely On Interested Witnesseslack of independent witnesses prosecution case weak India law, Hazi Iqbal Md v State of UP vexatious complaint principle, false allegations matrimonial dispute criminal case quashed, delay in FIR matrimonial dispute evidentiary value, Bhajan Lal guidelines quashing criminal proceedings India, Calcutta High Court quashes FIR matrimonial dispute visitation rights case, mens rea absence criminal liability father child case, frivolous criminal complaint matrimonial litigation misuse, interested witnesses reliability criminal law India High Court, criminal law safeguard against false implication matrimonial caseshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-88.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/supreme-court-quashes-rape-case-based-on-false-promise-of-marriage-holding-relationship-was-consensual-over-years-with-full-knowledge-of-prior-marriages/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T12:10:43+00:00Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Based On False Promise Of Marriage, Holding Relationship Was Consensual Over Years With Full Knowledge Of Prior MarriagesRajasthan Public Service Commission v Lavanshu Sankhla judgment 2026, eligibility qualification must exist on application date Supreme Court ruling, administrative burden tracking qualifications Supreme Court observation, candidates acquiring degree after last date not eligible Supreme Court, High Court judgment set aside eligibility criteria recruitment Supreme Court, deletion of proviso Rule 12 Rajasthan Prosecution Service Rules 1978 effect, educational qualification cut off date recruitment India law, law degree requirement Assistant Prosecution Officer RPSC case, recruitment rules strict compliance qualification possession requirement, RPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer recruitment case law 2026, press note clarification eligibility valid recruitment process India, aliquid prohibetur ex directo principle recruitment law India, public employment eligibility cutoff date jurisprudence India, Supreme Court recruitment eligibility date application last date rule India, selection process certainty recruitment law Supreme Court Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-87.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/legal-hiring-opportunity-at-aditya-birla-capital/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T11:28:55+00:00Legal Hiring Opportunity at Aditya Birla Capitallaw jobs India, in-house counsel jobs India, Aditya Birla Capital jobs, in-house legal counsel India, corporate legal jobs, mid level legal jobs India, legal job openings India, legal jobs in India, corporate lawyer jobs India, legal professionals hiring, legal vacancies 3 to 5 years experience, Aditya Birla Capital legal jobs, legal recruitment India, legal careers India, Aditya Birla careers, finance company legal jobs, apply legal jobs Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/supreme-court-holds-that-relevant-date-for-acquiring-minimum-educational-qualification-in-recruitment-process-is-the-date-of-submission-of-application-pursuant-to-advertisement/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T07:50:47+00:00Supreme Court Holds That Relevant Date For Acquiring Minimum Educational Qualification In Recruitment Process Is The Date Of Submission Of Application Pursuant To AdvertisementRajasthan Public Service Commission v Lavanshu Sankhla judgment 2026, eligibility qualification must exist on application date Supreme Court ruling, administrative burden tracking qualifications Supreme Court observation, candidates acquiring degree after last date not eligible Supreme Court, High Court judgment set aside eligibility criteria recruitment Supreme Court, deletion of proviso Rule 12 Rajasthan Prosecution Service Rules 1978 effect, educational qualification cut off date recruitment India law, law degree requirement Assistant Prosecution Officer RPSC case, recruitment rules strict compliance qualification possession requirement, RPSC Assistant Prosecution Officer recruitment case law 2026, press note clarification eligibility valid recruitment process India, aliquid prohibetur ex directo principle recruitment law India, public employment eligibility cutoff date jurisprudence India, Supreme Court recruitment eligibility date application last date rule India, selection process certainty recruitment law Supreme Court Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-86.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/supreme-court-grants-bail-to-murder-accused-after-almost-four-years-in-custody-stressing-right-to-speedy-trial-under-article-21/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T07:44:02+00:00Supreme Court Grants Bail To Murder Accused After Almost Four Years In Custody, Stressing Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21regular bail granted after long custody without trial progress, Sahil Manoj Machare v State of Maharashtra bail order summary, no witnesses examined bail granted India case law, right to speedy trial Article 21 bail jurisprudence India, JB Pardiwala Vijay Bishnoi bail ruling summary, prolonged incarceration bail murder case India Supreme Court, undertrial rights Article 21 Indian Constitution Supreme Court, Bombay High Court bail denial reversed Supreme Court, undertrial prisoner bail due to delay in trial Supreme Court, Supreme Court bail speedy trial Article 21 judgment 2026, Section 302 IPC bail due to trial delay Supreme Court, speedy trial principle constitutional law India bail cases, delay in criminal trial grounds for bail India, criminal trial delay violation fundamental rights India, criminal justice reform speedy trial Supreme Court observationshttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-85.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/05/madhya-pradesh-high-court-holds-that-compassionate-appointment-is-not-a-heritable-property-right-and-insisting-on-succession-certificate-is-arbitrary/Lawcutoren2026-05-05T07:33:21+00:00Madhya Pradesh High Court Holds That Compassionate Appointment Is Not a Heritable Property Right and Insisting on Succession Certificate Is ArbitraryJai Kumar Pillai judgment compassionate appointment policy 2014 MP, married daughter claim rejected compassionate appointment judgment, nomination vs statutory policy compassionate appointment India, married daughter vs son priority compassionate appointment India, writ petition 13968 of 2023 compassionate appointment ruling MP High Court, government employee death in harness compassionate job case India, compassionate appointment family dependency legal principles India, compassionate appointment policy applicability date of death rule India, Article 226 compassionate appointment dispute High Court ruling, MP compassionate appointment policy 2014 interpretation High Court, compassionate appointment eligibility hierarchy spouse son unmarried daughter law, Madhya Pradesh High Court compassionate appointment son vs daughter case, compassionate appointment not heritable right succession certificate not required, undertaking for maintenance of family compassionate appointment conditionhttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-84.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/04/rajasthan-high-court-holds-that-woman-in-void-second-marriage-not-entitled-to-maintenance-under-section-125-crpc/Lawcutoren2026-05-04T13:11:04+00:00Rajasthan High Court Holds That Woman in Void Second Marriage Not Entitled to Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPCS.B. Criminal Misc Petition 268 of 2019 Rajasthan High Court, Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya maintenance not allowed void marriage, Section 125 CrPC wife definition legal status requirement, Bhuwan Mohan Singh v Meena maintenance social justice interpretation, second marriage void not entitled maintenance Supreme Court precedents, void marriage maintenance claim rejected India law, Dwarika Prasad Satpathy maintenance presumption marriage law, Vimala v Veeraswamy maintenance object social purpose, Rajasthan High Court Section 125 CrPC maintenance denial second wife case, Yamunabhai Adhav case second wife maintenance principle, legally wedded wife requirement maintenance CrPC India judgment, maintenance claim rejected due to subsisting first marriage India, Shah Bano case Section 125 CrPC scope wife definition, domestic violence act Section 22 compensation alternative remedy, exploitation of women maintenance loophole Indian law judgmenthttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-83.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/04/supreme-court-sets-aside-high-court-order-allowing-belated-third-party-objection-in-execution-proceedings-holds-that-mother-of-judgment-debtor-cannot-stall-recovery-by-claiming-joint-family-share-at/Lawcutoren2026-05-04T13:05:07+00:00Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Allowing Belated Third-Party Objection in Execution Proceedings; Holds That Mother of Judgment Debtor Cannot Stall Recovery by Claiming Joint Family Share at a Late Stageattachment and auction sale confirmation decree execution India, joint family property claim rejected execution stage, prima facie proof requirement co ownership claim execution CPC, decree holder rights possession execution property case, civil procedure execution objections abuse of process India, executing court powers Order 21 CPC India law, delay in execution proceedings objection barred Supreme Court, Supreme Court Order XXI Rule 97 CPC objection execution case 2026, specific performance suit refund decree execution case Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-82.png?w=150https://lawcutor.in/2026/05/04/high-court-of-jammu-kashmir-and-ladakh-directs-release-of-gratuity-by-parent-organization-and-leave-salary-by-borrowing-organization-in-deputation-case/Lawcutoren2026-05-04T04:13:08+00:00High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Directs Release of Gratuity by Parent Organization and Leave Salary by Borrowing Organization in Deputation Caseleave salary borrowing organization reimbursement rule JK CSR, Jammu and Kashmir High Court deputation gratuity leave salary judgment, government employee deputation retiral dues High Court ruling, inter departmental liability deputation service benefits India, borrowing department leave salary liability India law, Article 240 BB JK CSR gratuity payment responsibility, JK CSR Schedule XVIII deputation rules explained, gratuity liability parent organization deputation case India, deputation service law India gratuity leave encashment case, Article 185 B leave salary deputation foreign service rules, parent department obligation gratuity release judgment, WP(C) 2973/2022 gratuity delay interest 10 percent ruling, delay in retiral benefits compensation interest India, Payment of Gratuity Act Section 7(3A) interest on delayed payment, service law deputation dispute gratuity leave salary Indiahttps://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/website-2.png?w=150