<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/orissa-high-court-quashes-matrimonial-criminal-proceedings-under-sections-498-a-323-354-506-34-ipc-after-amicable-settlement-between-parties/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-18T08:18:54+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Orissa High Court Quashes Matrimonial Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498-A, 323, 354, 506 &#038; 34 IPC After Amicable Settlement Between Parties</news:title><news:keywords>orissa high court, inherent powers high court, Section 528 BNSS, High Court judgment 2026, Manjit @ Mandeep Kaur v. State of Odisha, criminal case quashed, Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, CRLMC petition, criminal intimidation Section 506 IPC, domestic violence allegations, abuse of process of law, compromise in criminal cases, Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab, matrimonial dispute settlement, quashing of criminal proceedings, assault Section 323 IPC, outraging modesty Section 354 IPC, Section 498A IPC, family dispute resolution, B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-24.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/supreme-court-enhances-wifes-maintenance-from-%e2%82%b915000-to-%e2%82%b925000-per-month-holds-that-loan-repayments-for-asset-creation-cannot-dilute-husbands-primary-maintenance-obligation/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-18T07:46:23+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court Enhances Wife&#8217;s Maintenance From ₹15,000 To ₹25,000 Per Month, Holds That Loan Repayments For Asset Creation Cannot Dilute Husband&#8217;s Primary Maintenance Obligation</news:title><news:keywords>matrimonial disputes india, Supreme Court judgment 2026, alimony India, maintenance law India, family court maintenance order, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, maintenance enhancement, Deepa Joshi v. Gaurav Joshi, High Court Uttarakhand, wife maintenance rights, income assessment maintenance, family law India, spousal maintenance, dignified living standard, husband duty to maintain wife, Section 144 BNSS, loan repayment vs maintenance, maintenance quantum, Canara Bank employee case, arrears of maintenance, financial obligations law</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-23.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/kerala-high-court-denies-anticipatory-bail-solely-on-ground-of-concealment-that-accused-was-abroad-at-the-time-of-filing-application/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-18T05:46:21+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Kerala High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail Solely On Ground Of Concealment That Accused Was Abroad At The Time Of Filing Application</news:title><news:keywords>kerala high court, anticipatory bail, bharatiya nyaya sanhita 2023, bail jurisprudence India, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, sexual offences India, IT Act Section 66E, criminal procedure India, Anu Mathew v State of Kerala, discretionary relief bail, rape allegations law, bail rejection grounds, pre arrest bail India, premeditated crime, investigation stage bail, accused abroad bail, concealment of facts, Shahir Basheer v. State of Kerala, Section 482 BNSS, suppression of material facts, Kerala High Court judgment 2026, High Court bail order</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-22.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url><url><loc>https://lawcutor.in/2026/04/18/rajasthan-high-court-upholds-ex-parte-reinstatement-of-daily-wage-worker-holds-termination-without-complying-with-section-25-f-of-industrial-disputes-act-is-illegal/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Lawcutor</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-18T03:13:13+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Rajasthan High Court Upholds Ex-Parte Reinstatement Of Daily Wage Worker; Holds Termination Without Complying With Section 25-F Of Industrial Disputes Act Is Illegal</news:title><news:keywords>rajasthan High court, continuity of service, Industrial Disputes Act 1947, reinstatement with back wages, worker protection laws India, illegal termination, retrenchment compensation, notice and compensation requirement, Sarpanch Gram Panchayat Thatad v. Banshi Lal, daily wage worker rights, labour law India, Gram Panchayat employment, Rajasthan service law, Labour Court award, irregular appointment law, writ petition dismissal, natural justice in termination, public employment dispute, Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act, ex parte award, employment termination procedure, Rajasthan Regulation of Appointments Act 1999, Section 9 Rajasthan 1999 Act, High Court judgment 2026</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://lawcutor.in/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/website-21.png?w=150</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
