Case Comment Case Comment on Rajesh Chaddha v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 671) 19 Sep 202519 Sep 2025 By: Kavin Kumaraswamy Introduction: The Supreme Court's decision in Rajesh Chaddha v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2025 INSC 671, May 13, 2025)[1] focused on what kind of evidence is needed for convictions…
Case Comment Case Comment: Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr. (2025 INSC 162) 19 Sep 2025 By: Tannu Singh The landmark Supreme Court judgment in Vihaan Kumar v. State of Haryana & Anr. (2025 INSC 162), delivered on February 7, 2025, addressed the critical issue of…
Case Comment Kiren Raju Penamacha Vs Tejuswini Chowdhary: A Brief Case Analysis 18 Sep 2025 By: Shubh Tewari Introduction The Supreme Court has delivered a significant judgement on 17th March 2025 titled as Kiren Raju Penamacha vs Tejuswini Chowdhary (2025 INSC 358) arising out of…
Case Comment Case Brief: Pragya Prasun & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. and Amar Jain v. Union of India & Ors. 16 Sep 2025 By: Anushka Singh Title: Pragya Prasun & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. and Amar Jain v. Union of India & Ors.Citation: (2025) INSC 599Court: Supreme Court of IndiaBench:…
Case Comment Bansal Milk Chilling Centre v. Rana Milk Food Private Ltd. (2025 INSC 899) – Section 200 CrPC and Amendment of Complaints 26 Jul 202526 Jul 2025 Introduction In 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant judgment in Bansal Milk Chilling Centre v. Rana Milk Food Private Ltd. (2025 INSC 899), a case that clarifies…
Case Comment Case Analysis of R v Hancock and Shank land (27 Feb 1985) 7 Nov 20207 Nov 2020 FACTS During the miner’s strike of 1984-5, two miners dropped concrete objects onto the path of an incoming convoy bearing a strike-breaking miner.[1]One day two miners were working on a…
Case Comment Balwant Singh and Anr. v. State of Punjab, (1995) 1 SCR 411 17 Oct 2020 Introduction In 1995, in Balwant Singh v. State of Punjab, the Supreme Court overturned a sedition conviction for sloganeers who shouted incendiary slogans shortly after the assassination of Indira Gandhi, on the grounds…
Case Comment Minerva Mills Ltd. &Ors. v Union of India &Ors. [AIR 1980 SC 1789] 5 Oct 2020 Introduction In the case of Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala[1] the Honourable Supreme Court of India had held that even though the Parliament had the power to amend the…
Case Comment NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITIES VS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 3 Aug 2020 BY: Upasana chopra & Nisarg Trivedi Bench = Justice K.S. Radhakrishnan, Justice A.K. Sikri REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. = 400…
Case Comment NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY vs. UNION OF INDIA: AIR 2014 SC 1863 3 Aug 2020 BY: Divyapratap & Prachi Atul Tandon Procedural Background of the case Name Of The Court, Judges And The Parties  Supreme Court (BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN  AND MR.…
Lawcutor 