The Supreme Court granted bail to Siddhant @ Sidharth Balu Taktode under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), highlighting the prolonged incarceration and significant delay in trial. The Court expressed concern over the fact that out of 102 dates over six years, the accused had not been produced before the Court for most of them, either physically or virtually. The Court described this delay as a “sorry state of affairs,” noting that charges had not even been framed, and emphasized the violation of the accused’s right to a speedy trial, protected under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Court’s Observations and Directions
The bench, comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, referenced the decision in Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement and highlighted that prolonged detention without trial amounts to sentencing without facing the trial, which is a miscarriage of justice. The Court also emphasized that delays in trial are detrimental not only to the accused but also to the victim’s rights. In light of these findings, the Court directed the Registrar General of the High Court of Bombay, along with the Maharashtra State’s Home and Law Secretaries, to collaborate and create a mechanism to ensure the timely production of accused individuals in court.
The Court also recognized the need to prevent such delays in future cases and called for an urgent review of why video conferencing facilities were not being utilized to expedite the process, as had been requested in a previous matter.
Conditions for Bail
While granting bail, the Court imposed certain stringent conditions to protect the interests of the prosecution and the victim.
Case Title: Siddhant @ Sidharth Balu Taktode v. State of Maharashtra and Another
Lawcutor 