The Supreme Court, while restoring the Family Court’s order of ₹1.75 lakh as monthly interim maintenance to a wife during divorce proceedings, reaffirmed the principle that a dependent spouse is entitled to maintain the same standard of living during the proceedings as they had in the matrimonial home.
Key Observations
A bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Prasanna B. Varale emphasized:
“The appellant (wife) was accustomed to a certain standard of living in her matrimonial home and therefore, during the pendency of the divorce petition, is also entitled to enjoy the same amenities of life as she would have been entitled to in her matrimonial home.”
The Court further noted that the wife had sacrificed her employment after marriage and was financially dependent on her husband.
Case Background
Marriage and Divorce Filing: The parties married on September 15, 2008, under Christian customs. The husband filed for divorce in 2019, citing incompatibility and cruelty.
Maintenance Claim: The wife sought ₹2.5 lakh per month in interim maintenance, citing her husband’s significant income from medical practice, property rentals, and other ventures.
Family Court Order: The Family Court directed the husband to pay ₹1.75 lakh as monthly maintenance.
High Court Reduction: On appeal, the Madras High Court reduced the amount to ₹80,000, considering only limited sources of the husband’s income.
Supreme Court’s Analysis
The Court held that the High Court erred by disregarding crucial findings of the Family Court, which identified the husband’s broader income streams, including:
- Significant property holdings.
- Inherited wealth as the sole heir of his father.
- Income from properties managed by his mother.
The Supreme Court emphasized that maintenance awards must reflect the dependent spouse’s lifestyle during the marriage and the earning spouse’s financial capacity.
Judgment
The Court set aside the High Court’s order and restored the Family Court’s direction, requiring the husband to pay ₹1.75 lakh per month to the wife as interim maintenance.
Significance
This decision reinforces the dependent spouse’s right to financial support that ensures continuity of their matrimonial lifestyle during divorce proceedings. It also underscores the importance of thoroughly evaluating the earning spouse’s financial capabilities before determining maintenance awards.
Case Details:
Case Title: Dr. Rajiv Verghese v. Rose Chakkrammankkil Francis
Case No.: Civil Appeal No. 012546 of 2024
Lawcutor 